• donuts@kbin.social
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    All I want to know is if they are going to pillage people’s private data and steal their creative IP or not.

    Ethical AI starts and ends with open, transparent, legitimate and ethically sourced training data sets.

    • azuth@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Using copyrighted material for research is fair use. Any model produced by such research is not itself a derivative work of the training material. If people use it to create infringing (on the training or other material) they can be prosecuted in the exact same way they would if they created an infringing work via Photoshop or any other program. The same goes for other illegal uses such as creating harmful depictions of real people.

      Accepting any expansion of IP rights, for whatever reason, would in fact be against the ethics of free software.

      • donuts@kbin.social
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Using copyrighted material for research is fair use. Any model produced by such research is not itself a derivative work of the training material.

        You’re conflating AI research and the AI business. Training an AI is not “research” in a general sense, especially in the context of an AI that can be used to create assets for commercial applications.

        • azuth@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          It’s not possible to research AI without training them.

          It’s probably also not possible to train a model whose creations cannot be used for commercial applications.