Also anyone can tell me the difference in performance between the white one and the blue one??

  • SuperIce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    It should be noted that the way you listed the partitions misses the dual (A/B) install method that the deck uses. There are 2 identical size partitions for root, var, and EFI. When an update occurs. The system installs the new update on the inactive set of partitions and then tells the UEFI to use the other set on the next boot. That doesn’t matter too much for 512GB models like your’s, but the extra ~5.5GB for the redundant partition layout can be significant for 64GB models.

    • NoXPhasma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’ve used df -h and that showed only this three partitions. I’ve only skipped the tmpfs mounts.

      • SuperIce@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        The df command only shows mounted devices and filesystems. You can use lsblk to show all block devices and their partitions. To format it more nicely to show the labels for each partition, you can use these options: lsblk -o name,mountpoint,partlabel,size.

        This is the output from my deck without the microsd card:

        deck@steamdeck ~> lsblk -o name,mountpoint,partlabel,size
        NAME        MOUNT PARTLABEL   SIZE
        nvme0n1                     476.9G
        ├─nvme0n1p1       esp          64M
        ├─nvme0n1p2       efi-A        32M
        ├─nvme0n1p3       efi-B        32M
        ├─nvme0n1p4 /     rootfs-A      5G
        ├─nvme0n1p5       rootfs-B      5G
        ├─nvme0n1p6 /var  var-A       256M
        ├─nvme0n1p7       var-B       256M
        └─nvme0n1p8 /home home      466.3G