• electric_nan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    Violent regime change? How about humanitarian intervention in a fucking genocide? The US has never been shy about violent regime change, and this is true of whichever party is in power. Here we have a clear justification for forceful intervention and you pretend to some equivocation? Do you have any moral standards at all, or simply political calculation?

    • Jesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      There is whole lot of options between where we are now, which is giving arms to Bibi, and assassinating the leader of a country with democratic elections and nukes.

      He’s hanging on to power by a fart and a prayer. His political career likely wouldn’t survive sanctions.