• mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 months ago

    Less work being done by anyone is better. Thinking it’s bad that work is done for us by robots is the brain worms talking.

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Indeed. Ideally AI would do every job, so that humans can focus on just doing what we want to do. It’d be like the whole species getting to retire.

      • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        You’d rather cheer for people to lose their jobs without anyone calling you out on it, sure.

        I’m not the angry one wishing unemployment on my “enemies” here.

        Who are you?

        What do you want?

        • FaceDeer@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          The ideal endpoint is to eliminate the concept of “jobs” entirely. Why should people have to work?

          • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            Okay. So why are you breaking that guy’s balls, over automating away jobs, which you don’t want to exist?

            • FaceDeer@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              Because currently we do need jobs. Otherwise why is he upset about AI in the first place?

                • FaceDeer@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Sure seems to be, he said he’s “stoked” for when AI comes for the “tech bros”’ jobs. But maybe he should speak up to clarify his own view, rather than you and I speculating about it in a side thread that wasn’t actually about him to begin with?

                  • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    Are you sure you know what stoked means? Because it sure isn’t anger.

                    But maybe he should speak up to clarify his own view

                    Or you could’ve asked, rather than repeatedly posturing. Especially when he asked you to stop doing that.

                    You need to examine your behavior throughout this thread.