Domenicali believes the arrival of ‘sustainable’ fuels in 2026 will allow F1 to do away with hybrids and shift back to using conventional combustion engines in the future.

      • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Because it’s more of a buzzword than a goal. Carbon neutral, in theory, means a company reduces their carbon output where they can and then reimburse the rest of the carbon they can’t reduce. In practice it means a company can literally do nothing to reduce their emissions, pay someone else to offset the carbon they refuse to reduce and then claim “we’re carbon neutral” while polluting with the same rate as they were before. Carbon neutral simply does not go far enough.

        • vin@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          You’re mixing up carbon neutral fuels and carbon neutral companies. Your argument holds good for the second.

        • kbal@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          In this case it’s not “carbon neutral” as in carbon neutral if you subtract the credit that a carbon offset company gave us for using our giant pile of money to bribe someone not to burn down a bit of rainforest on the far side of the world. It’ll be genuinely carbon neutral. Unlike the rest of us, F1 can afford to use the finest pure synthetic fuel made from organic hand-picked potatoes with energy from 100% green electrons.

          It may be only a small gesture compared to the vast enterprise of shipping so many tons of equipment and people all around the world, but it’s sort of cool nonetheless.

  • smeg@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 months ago

    How much of this is to avoid stepping on the toes of Formula E? (I know people mention some kind of exclusivity arrangement but I’ve never seen the actual facts on that)

    I’d also be interested to know how polluting these sustainable replacements for petrol are, I feel if they were a miracle fuel we’d already know about it!

  • DrCake@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 months ago

    The hybrid systems aren’t just there to be “green”. It adds performance so I really don’t understand getting rid.

  • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m happy going back to high-revving non-hybrids.

    I’m happy sticking to the hybrids we have now.

    I’m not fine with 2026’s removal of the MGU-H, which just gives us what we have now only more compromised. The MGU-H is probably the most fascinating aspect of current F1 engines.

    • Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      The MGU-H is probably the most fascinating aspect of current F1 engines.

      This.

      Technologically, the MGU-H is quite the marvel. I am sad that engine manufacturers have cried their way into getting it removed

  • Nighed@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    Will the manufacturers be interested? Although I guess that a plain engine is much easier?

    I doubt it will happen.

    • kbal@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Maybe their (and our) 25-year run of pretending that gasoline-electric hybrids were an adequate way to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions is finally nearing its end.

      • Nighed@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        A hydrogen engine (not fuel cells) could be better, best of both worlds.