• partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    10 days ago

    This could be very useful to run really old PC tied commercial and industrial equipment. There is a surprising amount of old systems still keeping our lives running in small niche ways. It could be:

    The fact that this has all the legacy ports of:

    • IEEE 1284 parallel printer port
    • RS-232 serial port
    • a 16 bit ISA slot breakout!

    …gives this some of the newest hardware I can think of that still interfaces with old ancient hardware.

    • Steve
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      Me, dumpster diving 286 computers 2 decades ago to make backup controllers for a very profitable machine.

      I wonder if that thing is still operating

  • Travelator@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    $200? Jeez.

    I got a $32 11" Dell Chromebook last month to use as a video player at work, it’s great. Stuck in a 128GB microSD and it’s better than fine.

    And I can listen to the baseball game on it, when I’m not watching Star Trek. 😁

    • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      The point is not power but hardware compatibility. Emulation only goes so far and many, if not most, weird esoteric hardware systems from the 90s depended on idiosyncracies and strange usage of standard busses and weird interactions of the CPU. Emulation almost always breaks this.

    • Qkall@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      10 days ago

      i believe the use case is for old tech that require win95/dos …like interfacing with old science instruments

  • Kokesh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 days ago

    It runs Doom, but unplayable speed. They should have run it as 386DX. Had one from AMD, it was running quite well.

    • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      looks like the implemented CPU (ULi M6117C) supports a coprocessor interface, so it is entirely possible that a 387sx equivalent could give it floating point capabilities. it’s probably not electrically implemented on this specific device to expose the interface though. otherwise yeah no FP sucks

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 days ago

        While an FPU (Floating Point Unit aka math coprocessor) would be nice, the 386SX is still a 16-bit CPU. The 386DX is a 32-bit CPU (and would still need a 387 for a dedicated FPU). In the 486 line SX meant no FPU, while DX meant FPU inside.

        • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 days ago

          ahhh fuck I forgot about that little stupid memory bus cheat that Intel pulled. they’ve been good at obfuscating their screwing of consumers thru weird naming schemes ever since they started lol

  • Yuri addict@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    My second hand t480 is cheaper than that with 512 gigs of ssd storage and 16 gigs of ram

  • SplashJackson@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    I saw a story about this every day for the last four days. Why this product getting so much pushing?