Four trustees of a controversy-mired western Manitoba school board met on Monday and voted to ban all but the Canadian, Manitoban and school flags, right after butting heads with a panel the province appointed to help guide them in their roles.

The Mountain View School Division board has nine seats on its board, so the four trustees present at Monday’s meeting weren’t enough to achieve the quorum required under the Public Schools Act — but they went ahead with a school boarding meeting anyway.

The province ordered a governance review of the school board in April, after trustee Paul Coffey gave a board meeting presentation in which he said residential schools started as a good thing, questioned the extent of abuse at the schools and called the term “white privilege” racist.

  • Sundial@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    17 days ago

    Maybe its just me but I’m not understanding what the ban is about? It touched on Aboriginals and the residential school systems. Are they trying to exclude Aboriginal flags from being displayed at schools? Is that what this is about?

    • Swordgeek@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      I’m only guessing here, but I assume the comments on Residential schools are there to establish the bigotry of the board.

      The actual flag ban is typically done to prevent pride flags from being on display.

    • girlfreddy@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 days ago

      It’s about a racist group of people, who are currently under a provincial advisory board, but decided to have an official meeting without the quorum of individuals needed to have an official meeting.

      What they passed is incidental to the story.

      • Sundial@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        17 days ago

        My question was more along the lines of why did they decide to push this rule (out of all the possible rules you can come up with) through? Was it just randomly decided to score political points? Was it to silence certain voices?

          • Sundial@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            17 days ago

            Fair enough, maybe more information will come out as time goes by. Thanks for sharing the article though, sucks to see our school systems used for political theatre.

            • Value SubtractedA
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              17 days ago

              Flag restrictions are typically a way to ban Pride flags without actually saying it out loud.

    • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 days ago

      There are some linked articles that provided more information. The superintendent was fired days before a pride parade that was promoted by the division and the MMF. There are a number of conflicting claims surrounding his dismissal, which will probably get ironed out in court. The usual reason for banning flags is the suppress the promotion of something you don’t like, otherwise taste and relevance would be sufficient. Someone needs to start finding perfectly legitimate flags to be flown that don’t meet their criteria, such as city flags, sister city flags, flags for Saskatchewan in towns near the border, etc., until the rule is made to look completely absurd or they say out loud exactly what they are bigoted against. If nothing else, it will tie them up dealing with inane topics so they don’t have as much time to do more harmful things.

      My guess, based on the related articles, is that they want to ban the MMF and/or pride flags.