• Monster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    52 minutes ago

    If the suits who run society find out that people would get this fruit for free, they’d probably make it so that taking this fruit is considered stealing. You’d get a fine, charged with thievery because it’s property of the city.

  • spicystraw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Don’t fruit trees need extra care and pruning, and the fruit that falls to the ground is also kind of a mess to clean up. Sturdy trees are good in the city, since they are low upkeep and very good for air quality and shade. I am however a huge fan of vertical gardens with edible plants. Imagine a whole wall with mint growing on it, that would be wicked!

    • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      If you want to maximize production, yeah, you cut at certain times of the year to force the trees to put as much energy into the fruit as possible. But if you just leave them outside they will fruit as long as they are sufficiently watered and have enough room to grow (and it’s not insanely stressed from a drought or heat wave, etc). There might not be as many fruits, and they might be smaller, but it will produce. But ideally you always want to choose fruit or nut trees that are native to your region (or at least your agricultural zone) so that they require less upkeep in general.

    • Benjaben@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I think it’s a combination of the effort required and sadly the liability too. I would imagine anyone who is saying “feel free to come eat this food” is exposing themselves to lawsuits, to some degree. The kinds of organizations who are large enough to make a big impact by deciding to grow some food on their properties are the same ones who’d be targeted by frivolous lawsuits, costing money just to defend against, and offering the orgs no tangible benefit in return.

      To be clear, I don’t agree with structuring things this way and I think it’s a trash way for our society to work, but growing food in “public” places seems non-viable without addressing that big vulnerability somehow.

  • Zexks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    34 minutes ago

    I hope they plan on coming back through and cleaning up all the not used drops. Especially before they all start rotting or animals get drunk on them and run into traffic.

  • 4am@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I mean cmon though - in a capitalist country someone would take ALL the fruit and then sell it to people. “It was public but then it became MINE and if you want it you need to enrich MY wealth with a piece of YOUR value”

    • Retro_unlimited@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Reminds me of a video I saw of a lady taking all the books from a “little library” someone has in front of their house. The lady thought free books to sell, but didn’t care it’s a “library” means check out books or trade books.

    • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Then I say we enforce the social contract of “don’t be a fucking asshole”, with force if needed.

  • The Pantser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Same comments I got when I said I was planting apple trees in my front yard. Those are for the public, the ones in my back yard are for me.

    • abbadon420@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Everyone in my street is selling their apples on the street. Every house has a little basket and a sign “1 kilo 1 euro” or something like that. Some are even giving them away for free. I gave mine away in bulk, so I haven’t got anything to pu in the street.

  • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    I remember when I was young I got ticketed for trespassing on public property. I was so offended. Yet that’s the society we live in. Public resources aren’t for use by the public, they are for use by the small fraction of the public who control them.

  • Ace! _SL/S@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    There will be atleast 1 asshole trying to take all the aplles fer themselves. I guarantee it

  • woop_woop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Presumably because everyone assumes the tragedy of the commons will happen as it always does. And, little red hen, there’s a sense that if one person does the work, they are owed the fruits of their labor

    • basmati@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      “as it always happens” The commons were around as a concept longer than the concept of ownership. Eventually this unsustainable idea of private ownership for profit will collapse and we’ll be back to working towards a common good.

    • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Talking about tragedy of the commons on the internet, in a decentralized network, is an extremely funny bit.

      Do I need to mention that the guy who came up with it was a racist who wanted to justify displacing the “unproductives”?

      • woop_woop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        To your first point, why? You know what the Internet is like outside the fediverse right?

        To your second, I guess you can. Don’t know what it has to do with the subject at hand

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It’s only a tragedy if allowing “first come, first served” until the resource is completely exhausted is actually a problematic outcome. For urban fruit trees intentionally planted for the public, I’d argue that that isn’t the case.

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      But a fruit tree in a public space is like an open field or playground equipment in a public space. They are there for everyone, and people who complain that the ‘wrong people’ are using those public rrsources for personal use are selfish idiots.

      Like if a company came in and took all the fruit, sure, that would be wrong. But someone taking apples to make a pie? That’s what it is there for.

      • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        What if I hire a dozen people to randomly, individually go and pick all the fruit and bring it to me, and then I make a profit reselling what they collect?

      • woop_woop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        What if one person comes in and takes it all? Don’t even need companies, just individuals.

        That’s the tragedy of the commons.

        • snooggums@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          What if the tree only produces 3 fruit, is it wrong for three siblings to pick and eat them?

          • woop_woop@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Idk, you tell me. I’m suggesting that scarce resources not owned by anyone will get used by those who take it. This is a fact. What then? Is it bad? Is it ok? Pretending it’s not a thing is to deny reality and all of human/life history

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Plus having rotting fruit laying around will encourage pests. Maybe put these into specific areas rather than just scattering them around.

        • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I’m thinking about fruit trees and bushes specifically. If you’ve ever gone apple picking you see how many apples are on the ground. Domesticated fruit trees are bred and grafted to be highly prolific, and you’ll have a lot more fruit dropped than you’d think.

          Plus you’ll have animals going into the trees to eat the fruit. Commercial berry farmers have to cover their bushes and trees with nets to prevent birds from picking them clean. (And then producing very colorful art on outdoor surfaces.)

          I’m not saying it’s a bad idea, but I don’t think people have entirely thought it through.

        • BougieBirdie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Yeah, my city has street sweepers and gardeners, so I wouldn’t imagine this would be a huge problem.

          They could even put out compost bins like public trashcans. I wouldn’t mind cleaning up a couple of fruits here and there as I walk by.

          If it’s in a public place in front of businesses and such, then the business has an incentive to keep things tidy. So all in all, I think it’s a fairly easy problem to solve.

  • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    And then you have old ladies come by to take all the fruit for themselves saying “It’s public property bitch!!”