I was expecting something clearly offensive, like FUCK YOU shaved into his head, but nope.

Personally, I think his hair looks pretty cool.

  • flak@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Greg Poole, who has been district superintendent since 2006, said the policy is legal and teaches students to conform as a sacrifice benefitting everyone.

    “When you are asked to conform … and give up something for the betterment of the whole, there is a psychological benefit,” Poole said. “We need more teaching (of) sacrifice.”

    Fuck right off with that. Your appearance (so long as it’s not designed specifically to distract) is yours. We have minimal ways of expressing ourselves and that is one of them.

    • CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Greg Tool, more like. What a regressive bag of dicks.

      By “conform” I can only assume he means this kid should be using noxious hair straighteners and speaking with the Mid-Atlantic accent.

      How weird is it that the school is called “Barber’s Hill High School” and they’re making a stink over hairstyles? But of course this was Texas, king of the shithole states.

    • apis@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yup.

      Would take this quote as highlighting the need to give this school a hard swerve.

      If my children were already in it, I’d need extremely compelling reasons to not withdraw them immediately.

  • idiomaddict@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    10 months ago

    His hair looks awesome and non distracting. Pink and blue hair in fifth grade could be distracting, but lots of things are distracting in school. Teachers should be trained to deal with this situation.

  • Hirom@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 months ago

    George’s hairstyle looks like it took a lot of work. I imagine it makes it especially frustrating to be told the haircut is wrong.

  • alyaza [they/she]@beehaw.orgM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    worth noting: it’s been a trend in the past few years for Democratic-run state legislatures (take for example New York) to introduce anti-discrimination laws for hair–and stories like this are basically why. certain kinds of reactionaries (usually in schooling) have increasingly been using hair as a stand-in for skin tone in basically discriminating against people.

    • magnetosphere @beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yeah. Younger, naive me didn’t understand why laws about hair were necessary. It didn’t make me angry; I just didn’t get it.

      Now I understand what assholes conservatives can be, and the lengths they will go to in order to keep discrimination alive.

  • Storksforlegs@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Seems like clear cut discrimination, I hope they’re able to fight this. The rules say “no hair below the eyebrows” and he’s pretty clearly not breaking that rule.