• TheSageRedneck@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    1 year ago

    European Union is doing the work the U.S. government should be.
    U.S. government is too busy worrying about what people are doing in their bedrooms, libraries and doctor’s offices.

  • maynarkh@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 year ago

    Beyond being good for right-to-repair, this used to be the one way to be sure that your phone is off and is not listening to you. It’s a stride on the privacy side as well.

    • veaviticus@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve replaced some “non replaceable” batteries in phones before… Only to find that after about 5 years of medium use the flash storage goes to shit (which causes massive slow downs), the chips begin to desolder themselves, the USB port gets janky and stops charging, etc.

      Batteries are a great first step, but damn these $1000+ devices just are not built to last more than 3 years

      • shanghaibebop@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        Honestly, they are pretty damn stressed devices though.

        If you think about it, they are on 24/7, with active usage at least 4-6 hours a day, exposed to god knows what humidity, unknown low and high temps, dropped every x days. It’s a modern technological miracle that they last as long as they do. Lots of read and writes with photo and video backups.

        My 5 year old X died a month back (flash memory failed), I was actually impressed that it lasted that long.

      • farktard_johnson@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, that’s the problem with these things: they’re wasting assets. If you want maximum longevity on your phone, not only do you need replaceable batteries but to purchase the absolute maximum storage so you can benefit from wear leveling on the flash. And even then, it will still slowly degrade over time.

        Google tried to build a modular phone and ended up cancelling the project in part because these systems are essentially an SOC surrounded by support hardware. Still, I’d buy a modular phone or at least one that allowed swappable batteries because Android phones are still a beast on battery thanks to all the background services and large, power hungry screens.

      • GadgeteerZA@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes I’m thinking next time around to go for a good mid-range. Considering the time that phones actually last, it’s too much to pay for flagship phones.

        • Gormadt@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not too mention what even is the point of getting a flagship?

          The cameras are great on most phones, the specs are good enough for most people’s use case (call, text, social media).

          Hell the last few years the consistently best rated phone camera by users has been the Pixel A series of phones. The budget Pixel phones.

          • ClammyMantis488@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            The only reason I got my flagship Sony Xperia is because it still had a headphone jack, sd slot, and no notch. It was expensive but everything I wanted. Last phone was an iPhone 6s. I wish there was cheaper options honestly for what I’m looking for but those 3 combinations don’t seem to exist other than Sony.

            • Gormadt@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I feel you on that

              I miss the days of sd slots, headphone jacks, and removable batteries.

              Phone cameras are pretty good now though and the Xperia has a damn good one

  • MrTHXcertified@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t mind that my phone battery is sealed up. I do mind that I have to bring it to a specialist that might screw it up and make me pay for the privilege.

    Actually, this bothers me way more with laptops than with phones. With laptops, there’s no water resistance or any other reason besides thinness to seal the battery up. Particularly with business machines, the computing power will be more-than-sufficient for many years to come, yet many will end up in the trash because the battery’s no longer doing its job. It’s ridiculously wasteful.

    • Michael Vogel@pirati.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      @MrTHXcertified I think that no device should be built in a way that it cannot be disassembled anymore. Concerning the argument “but what about water resistance?”: remember that for a long time there are quartz watches that are water resistant to incredible depths - and their batteries can be replaced.

    • Haatveit@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Many laptops/ultrabooks have easily accessible batteries nowadays, any specific example when you mean sealed up?

      • MrTHXcertified@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        All of them. You could argue that the time and expertise needed to replace a laptop battery is negligible, but I say it’s an unnecessary increase of time and risk required to do so.

        What do you feel are the benefits of embedding a laptop battery in the case?

        • boonhet@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          What do you feel are the benefits of embedding a laptop battery in the case?

          Portability for one. You can move your laptop without worrying about the battery latches getting damaged.

          I used to refurb laptops and I’ve seen plenty of externally mounted batteries that just wouldn’t reliably sit on the laptop anymore.

    • catcarlson@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I remember when I was looking for a new laptop, I made a replaceable battery a requirement, since my previous laptop’s battery (which wasn’t replaceable) lost its charge very fast.

      Out of the hundreds of laptops available today, I could only find two or three laptop models total with a replaceable battery. And none of them were in physical stores, so a less tech-minded person would never find them.

      Interestingly, the replaceable battery also seems to be higher quality than the permanent battery was.

      • mike901@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I got one of the framework laptop over a year ago and it’s been fantastic other than having a defective trackpad (which took all of 10 minutes to replace after receiving a free replacement part from their support team). I will even be able to upgrade to a newer mainboard with an AMD CPU from the current 11th gen intel later this year when the boards start shipping.

        It really grinds my gears when companies claim that repairable devices aren’t possible to make in modern form factors, especially when a rinky dink startup was able to do it.

      • boonhet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Out of the hundreds of laptops available today, I could only find two or three laptop models total with a replaceable battery.

        Nearly every business class laptop has a replaceable battery, you just need a philips-head screwdriver for most.

        Anything that is meant for consumers shouldn’t be bought anyway, Dell Inspirons and HP Pavilions and shit are not made to last unfortunately. Nor are they made to be easily repairable. I’d go as far as recommend an 8 year old thinkpad over some brand new consumer models. It’ll last longer.

    • probably_a_robot@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is a big part of why I bought a Framework laptop. Every part is easily accessible and they sell replacement parts. The laptops are even modular and upgradable

  • Nooch@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes! mandatory usb C and replaceable battery, and i’d like the 3mm headphonr jack to also be a standard 😁

      • zev@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Out of the phone vendor fuckery with the connector, battery, micro SD, and headphone 3.5mm, the headphones were always the biggest thing.

        Bring it back please EU hear my prayers. Right now I’m listening to music on my iPhone with a half broken dongle that pauses if I jiggle it wrong.

        • Molnar Eduard@feddit.ro
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The fucking audacity to remove a quintessential port is typical Apple. Was the same with DVDs, Ethernet, now even USB. Next thing I know there’ll be no more ports, you’ll have to wirelessly (and inefficiently) charge your phone even if you like it or not

      • dbucklin@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not for any technical reason afaik. My LG G7 is plenty modern and has a 3.5mm jack. It also has Bluetooth, so it’s not like it’s an either/or choice. It’s just the manufacturers dictating what choices consumers have.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          No, it’s easy as shit to smack a little audio DAC in there. It probably means your phone has to be at least as thick as the whole port, but so what? It’s a fashion statement to move to pure wireless really.

          I don’t hear about it so much anymore, though, so it seems it was accepted.

  • wildeaboutoskar@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    The EU has been good at holding phone manufacturers to account on this kind of thing, glad it’s gone through. I’ve had at least two phones die on me through the battery breaking, it shouldn’t be cheaper to just buy a new phone than get the battery replaced. So much waste.

    Hoping us UK folk will see the benefit of this as I imagine it’s less effort to just bring the change about across the board than to be specific about geography.

    • NattyNatty2x4@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      These days I don’t buy a phone if they don’t have a micro SD slot. Need that extra space without paying a bullshit upcharge for the larger model phone

    • omenmis@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      tbh SD cards are out and mostly for power users, make them compatible with M2 drives :))

      • ScherPegnau@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Screw M.2, I want to use my enterprise grade 7TB U.2 Kioxia drive in my 50 bucks Chinese phone, I just can’t live without it!

      • ciko22i3@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        SD cards and M.2 drives are not really comparable, since they are used for different things. It would be cool to have a phone that has main storage a M.2 drive, but i would still want it to have an SD card slot.

      • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The performance would be wasted on android since file access has gotten so damn slow on recent versions. It would be awesome on a Linux phone though.

      • Skiptrace@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        M.2 would make phones inordinately thick and un-usable. If you really need more than 1TB of storage on your phone, dump your pictures and Videos every so often to a home NAS PC running TrueNAS Core or Scale. And if you have Music on your phone that you own the files to, consider using your home NAS as a Media Server using Plex and use Plex Amp or some other app to stream the music direct to your phone.

  • Thoralf Will@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t even want to replace my battery. I want it to last. At least 5 years.

    Bring legislation that enforces a 5 year warranty on batteries that are built-in. That would help the environment much more than being able to replace a battery every year that shouldn’t fail in the first place. And yes, it’s possible to build batteries that last longer. It’s more effort, true. But so is building exchangeable batteries or doing an exchange. I rather shell off 50 € more for my phone when I know that the battery will make it 5 years.

    • mpldr@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      I want it to last. At least 5 years.

      That is something that would be very hard to legislate. Especially since battery lifetime is dependent on a variety of external factors (charging-style, temperature of the device, luck). Build quality certainly also factors in, but even the best battery won’t survive a 10 year old regularly overheating their phones with games and charges it for the entire night. I would love to see OEMs implement nice things like “capacity settings”, where you can set your device to stop charging at 80% and show it as 100%.

      • Thoralf Will@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is exactly what happens in cars. Usually, you have an 8 year warranty for your battery.

        Yes, a phone is smaller. Less space and weight. But 5 years are less as well. The electronics can track everything, shut the phone down if it’s too hot (and not when it’s so hot that it’s in danger to burst into flames like it is now). Adjust the charging speed by temperature. Do not charge the battery to 100 %. …

        All things the manufacturer can influence.

        • Haatveit@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          These are all things that most phones already do, though. I think a realistic expectation of battery lifetime is needed here. Better allow for easier replacement in my opinion, the batteries themselves are not expensive (though we don’t want to generate unnecessary waste, so, of course we try to make them last as long as feasible)

          • Thoralf Will@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            No, they don’t.

            The switch off far too late. The battery is built for weight and size, not for durability. The do not keep a margin to preserve battery life and charge way too high and too low.

            Replacing batteries is the wrong approach, because it wastes resources we don’t need to waste.

            I’m firmly convinced that 5 years battery life is achievable, if we just force the companies to do it. It’s just cheaper for them not to do it right now. And companies always do what is cheapest.

            And worse: This legislation will actually cement the battery degradation, because the companies have even less reason to build batteries that last. “Just replace them!” will be the answer if it’s dead after 6 months.

        • Skiptrace@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          On a Phone, people are already conditioned to have their phone work all the time, no matter what you do to it, and there is an advertised Maximum Battery Capacity.

          People don’t do the 80/20 rule on Phones because that’s outrageous to them.

          But EV Manufacturers have built in the 80/20 rule into their cars. When you do long distance EV trips, the Route Planner will automatically tell you where the next charger that you will arrive at 20%-ish battery capacity will be and route you there. And the car will stop charging itself at 80% and you’ll be ready to go.

          Phones on the other hand, tell you “Hey moron, I’m at 30% you should charge me!” And most phones don’t have a Battery Protection setting to cut charging at 80% (Samsung added this about a year ago to their phones)

          • catcarlson@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you shouldn’t charge over 80%, why don’t manufacturers just report a battery at 80% its “real” capacity as 100% charged? Same for the lower margins. It would probably make things easier for people to understand.

      • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They would probably have to switch to LiFePO4 batteries to get 5 years reliably. That would increase the thickness of the phone quiet a bit if you want the same capacity.

        Lipo batteries are not capable of being cycled daily for 5 years, even under ideal conditions.

      • strainedl0ve@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Android (or at least some) have this feature now, the charging rate is usually adjusted based on time of the day, next alarm clock setting, charger type, etc

        • mpldr@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not android, but Google as far as I am aware. At least my battery settings (latest graphene OS) are… limited to say the least

    • madnerds@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It would be nice to have it covered in a phone warranty or something. Would like to also see legislation requiring software updates for 5 years, is kind of silly how fast devices are considered obsolete by their manufacturers. Even Microsoft supports Windows versions for like 10 years.

      • Serenus@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is what sucked me into the Apple ecosystem in the first place. The first couple of Android devices I had were paperweights within 2-3 years. Shifting to Apple, I’ve yet to have a device last less than six years.

    • rysiek@szmer.info
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same! But the beauty of it is that this effectively creates a competitive advantage for Fairphone. Fairphone is already compliant, while all other smartphone companies will have to develop this from ~scratch.

      • Yozul@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Depends on where you live and what service provider you use. There is quite a bit of overlap between European and American cell frequencies, but it’s not something you can just assume will work.

    • Skiptrace@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The main problem with Fairphone is… It won’t come to the US. However, I am very happy that this will affect Apple, because I am making the switch from Android to iOS. I know that Apple won’t be stupid enough to have two separate plants, one to make EU Compatible phones, and one to make Global phones.

      The costs for such a thing would be inordinately high even for Apple.

      • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’ll be interesting to see what Apple does, between this and the USB-C mandate.

        Considering they currently sell multiple phone form factors, they may just decide that the EU gets more expensive phones with removable batteries and USB-C, and the rest of the world continues to get what they’ve got.

        Also, I’ll be interested to see how “removable” gets defined. I’ve replaced iPhone batteries, so they’re technically removable.

        Or, Apple might claim that their MagSafe battery packs make them compliant.

      • newde@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Nah, the main problem of the FairPhone is it’s water resistance. Which is the lowest of low. Not quite sustainable in that regard: youre always one wet pocket away from disaster.

    • MarionWheeler@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s unfortunate that Fairphone sucks in other ways (such as having limited firmware updates due to using an old SoC, as I understand it).

        • Marius@lemmy.mariusdavid.fr
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well… I can cite a few laws. First, the part that protect DRM, second, the law that require search engines to make contract to quote article, third, the interest in policing private communication, and last, a project that isn’t really advanced to infringe net neutrality.

          I doubt a US citizen will be shocked about them. But they are likely to dislike them.

          (but I tend to see the greener side of “for 1 bad things, 2 good things come next”)

        • PonyOfWar@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          There’s currently a law in the pipeline that would scan all conversations, videos and images sent over social networks as well as chat apps like Whatsapp for illegal material. It would also include backdoors in encryption technologies and possibly banning any services that don’t comply with the scanning, e.g. Signal. Love the EU in principle, but unfortunately it’s often used by national governments to push things like increased surveillance.

  • haych@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    Back in the day I used to just keep 2-3 fully charged spare batteries if I went out. No need for a battery pack to recharge if I can just quickly swap battery and get a days worth of charge instantly.

    • lemillionsocks@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I used to keep 2 extras as well back in the day when using the phone for an hour straight would kill it and I was on the go. I agree that batteries should be more easily replaced and the current design philosophy of hidden screws hidden behind a glued together screen is crazy .

      That said I think power banks are better. They store better they are universal so you can use them with different phones and devices and thanks to that theres less e-waste. They take longer to charge but if you know you need it you can just plug in before you get too low so you dont have to be plugged in to long.

      • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Agreed that power banks are better for those uses, but it’s also about what you do when the internal battery has degraded.

  • tr00st@lemmy.tr00st.co.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    The language in the article does seem to forget that plenty of early smartphones had replaceable batteries… Yeah, it might add some bulk, but it’s not exactly going to be a major hardship.

    … but it seems like a good reverse step to me. Any consumer replaceable part is a good thing as far as I’m concerned.

  • catacomb@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is why I got a Fairphone. I was done complaining about the direction of the mobile market and decided to buy a phone which lets me do all of this and has longer support for software and hardware. It’s the best phone I’ve had since the S3.

    It only works for me because I like Android, live in Europe and have big enough pockets, though… the thing is a brick.

    • exu@feditown.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I though about getting a Fairphone but it really didn’t work for me due to the missing headphone jack.

      • catacomb@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve got on okay without it but I already had Bluetooth headphones. It was understandably a pretty unpopular move.

        I kind of questioned it from their “sustainability” ethos, too. It means more people might throw away working wired earphones and buy much more complicated, expensive Bluetooth ones… which use more resources to make.

    • SubArcticTundra@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I got the king Kong Mini 2. The opposite of a brick (it’s tiny), probably US compatible, and the back literally has screws on it for when you need to change the battery/sim. Also £80

    • Richard A.@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Big enough financial pockets, or trouser pockets? :-). One reason I am discouraged from getting a fairphone phone is that I like smaller mobile phone screens.

    • Edgerunner Alexis@dataterm.digital
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      longer support for software and hardware

      Not to rain on your parade (I love the idea of the Fairphone!), but that’s actually a bit of misadvertising on Fairphone’s part — the SoCs they use are very outdated and near the end of their vender firmware and driver support, meaning they get maybe 2 years of the full support you’d expect when you say a manufacturer “supports” something, and then however many more years of hobbled support. Additionally, they’re just really bad about security.

      • catacomb@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You’ve got me down a rabbit hole now.

        Shorter than expected SoC support is one thing, but the hardware root of trust trusting AOSP test keys which was also stated by GrapheneOS is something else. That’s a total amateurish blunder and the only reason it’s not a complete disaster is you need to boot into EDL mode first to actually flash a recovery. The verified boot is practically useless.

        Thank you for bringing this to my attention, I’m not purchasing another phone from them. Unfortunate, because I liked the removable battery and seemingly long support. Back to the drawing board.

        • Edgerunner Alexis@dataterm.digital
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah when I found out about the Fairphone originally I was extremely excited and really wanted one for my next phone, but I use GrapheneOS my pixel right now so I figure I just check why it doesn’t support it and sure enough I found this stuff :(

      • boonhet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, if you want long support, what you really want is… an iPhone.

        But the EU might push through regulations that would force all manufacturers to support their phones for longer.