• raevn@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    So they dodge tax, sell things for less than market value, spend billions on advertising, have little regard for law… sound familiar? I guess the real issue is that it’s not an established player in this space!

    All of these problems are fixable if you’re wiling to have your own corporations bound by the same laws. Start by not allowing products to be sold at a loss, making large corps pay the tax they’re due, obey the law in regard to data privacy…

    By allowing corporations to write the law they’ve inadvertently allowed foreign players to play them at their own game. This kind of company would not exist in a health market.

    • optissima@possumpat.io
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      By allowing corporations they’ve allowed foreign players to play them at their own game.

      Ftfy

  • federalreverse-old@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    The platform runs in a similar way to Shein – offering a seemingly endless array of items direct from suppliers who make short production runs in response to customer interest. But it differs in that while Shein directly contracts suppliers to make the orders, Temu acts as more of a bridge, allowing suppliers to focus on their production run while the platform manages product listings, marketing, and logistics.

    “Yet, this comes at a cost for sellers: they relinquish control over pricing, return policies, and long-term sales growth planning,” says Yang. “Under this model, Temu’s duration of payments to sellers is notably longer, and the cashflow pressures fall on sellers, not platform.”

    I guess this means Temu will never actually need to raise prices to a level that is sustainable for the merchant, as long as there are enough merchants willing to deal with them as a platform. That is fucked up (and clever).