A paper owned by Rupert Murdoch says the Democrat will do poorly?
I… AM… SHOCKED…
deleted by creator
Do you have no idea who David Axelrod is? The WSJ DIDNT say Biden is doing bad, Obama’s former senior adviser did.
Avoiding the point eh O_O
This is worth some concern, but for fuck’s sake people… Remember how this year’s special elections were supposed to be all about Republican takeover of state legislatures? Or how 2022 was supposed to be a red wave?
Stop. Breathe. The election is a year away. And polls are very troubled right now, due to the difficulty of polling a young populace that doesn’t answer its phones, but votes in unprecedented numbers.
It’s not in the bag for Trump. Don’t give up hope almost a year before the first ballots are even cast.
This poll is only useful for political campaign strategists, political scientists, and anthropologists. For the average person, it doesn’t mean anything, because most people don’t vote based upon poll statistics.
Vote. Help out local campaign efforts. Democracy isn’t just going to fall into our laps.
No candidate that ever polled this low in their 3rd year has ever won reelection
Ronald Reagan polled lower in his third year, but you’re missing the point. We’re in wholly uncharted polling territory, because the pollsters haven’t figured out how to poll young people who don’t answer unknown numbers calling their cellphones, and they’re voting in unprecedented numbers.
In the mid-2010’s, the migration from landlines to cellphone-only households really got underway. We crossed the threshold where there were more cellphones than landlines in 2016, and it’s only continued from there. And an interesting thing started happening with polls around 2017 and 2018: They started consistently underestimating the strength of Democratic support in off-year and mid-term elections.
It’s why the “red wave” in 2022 turned out to be a pink dribble. It’s why Democrats did so unexpectedly well in the 2021 special elections. It’s why they also did well this year.
In 2024, people who were twelve years old in 2016 will be old enough to vote, and if the trends stay consistent, they will vote in droves. But none of them are answering pollster calls. And that makes polling them extraordinarily difficult.
Pollsters try to account for such things by adjusting weights and making various assumptions that they hope are accurate, but in the end you need actual data from real voters, and that’s just plain getting harder to get.
I’m not saying this poll looks good. It very much doesn’t. But at the same time, we shouldn’t fall into the trap of cynicism and apathy. It’s very possible this poll - like so many recent polls - is underestimating Democratic support.
There is still hope.
Reagan polled into the 50% range his third year, his lowest, into the 30s the beginning of his second year, January 1983.
75% of the polling was done online, and only 25% via telephone
Jesus, the press is leaning hard into this Trump-as-Thanos, “I am inevitable” narrative. The moneyed class really, really wants to get back to the constant, dopey distractions from the not-so-invisible hand that’s been robbing all us poor schlubs blind.
And you guys lean into blindfolding yourself and shoving your head through quick drying cement to avoid any teensy little thing that makes you even slightly uncomfortable lol
Is it just me or does Axelrod sound like a made up name. Like the name of a mechanic in a video game or a porn star.
For ordinary folks the economy hasn’t improved enough for Biden to start putting his name on it.
