• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    In the 18th century, men (like George Washington) wore make-up, frilly clothes, fancy wigs and stockings. Why do they hate our founders so much?

  • TheKingBee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I overall liked the article, but feel the ending failed and it doesn’t do any better at finding a solution than the Yang article it talks about.

    Like many such pronouncements, Yang’s argument supposes that male identity is effectively served up at a cultural condiment bar. Wounded and hostile men can simply order up different core elements of their identities, now that the undifferentiated forces of gender affiliation are granting permission for them to cry, to go to therapy, and have feelings. In lieu of adopting Yang’s model of masculinity as a glorified college elective, many young men gravitate toward Shapiro and Peterson’s masculinist politics of all-purpose cultural affront.

    The article then goes on the end basically the same thing…

    It’s admittedly hard to envision such a thing in a culture-war discourse so heavily invested in the idea of imperiled maleness, but a good place to start might be a frank acknowledgment of how much of this peril is self-imposed among gender-anxious men. Indeed, pace Reeves and Yang, boys and men in America are not all right—not because women are outearning them or outperforming them in some mythic sphere of gender fluidity. No, American boys and men are suffering because an American culture that outlines how to perform manliness following a solitary, stoic script of violent self-assertion is ruinous. If men relieve themselves from shackles of masochism and chauvinism anchored in this gendered ideology, they might learn that the most crucial role we could play in society is to free ourselves from this fundamentally unrewarding and self-harming image of ourselves

    cool, but as mentioned the men that need to hear it won’t be doing that, so it isn’t actually a solution.

        • Chozo@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If only there was an article that went further into detail on the subject.

          If only.

          • CorruptBuddha@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Fine…

            … And done.

            Dude… why are we using stereotypes as a point of reference? This article is trash. “Men today are anxious about x, y, z”, but what reason do we have to believe that 80 years ago it was any different?

            Like the basis of the article seems to be “men were fine until recent gender politics”.

  • dartanjinn@lemm.ee
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh. Another long winded, pretentious diatribe on how the right can’t accept modernism and capitalism caused it all. Jesus fuck get new material.