The arson attack in a revered Kyoto animation studio killed 36 people and injured dozens more.
As someone who kept up with the story from day one, I despise this man for what he did in his depraved mental state, and think he should be imprisoned for a long time to keep society safe from him. But at the same time I am against the death penalty no matter the crime, as I don’t believe the state should have the legal right right to execute anyone once they are not an immediate threat.
While I also not believe that a state should have the legal right to execute anyone as that can be, will be, and has been abused, I believe it is the absolute right of victims (or those who they left behind) to determine the punishment of those who wronged them up to a proportional degree with modifications due to circumstance (i.e. someone stealing because they are poor is given leniency).
How I feel about this execution is dependent on the wishes of the Kyoto fire survivors , victims, and their loved ones.
I would like to know what the general opinion about this sentence is.
Personally, I think that people like that are too dangerous to ever be let free again. But I still believe that we should never allow anyone to kill someone for punishment.Also I’m wondering whether other’s opinions are influenced by how much they like the works of KyoAni.
I don’t think it should matter at all. But to be honest, the only reason I even read about the fire was because anime communities were posting about it.I oppose the death penalty in very nearly every circumstance. I think that prisons should be more about rehabilitation that just brutish punishment (but the punishment exists at least in part to avoid extra-judicial attacks by the victims who feel the perpatrator was not justly punished). Some people, of course, cannot be rehabilitated and, in that case, I would lean toward life in prison.
I’ve been living in Japan the better part of a decade and don’t have strong opinions on anime or the like (I couldn’t tell you what KyoAni has made)
I’m more or less indifferent to this. I have other things to worry about than the fate of someone who killed 36. Death penalty or life, to me with this guy it’s all the same.
A death sentence just punishes the relatives of that person. The person killed, isn’t really punished, since you kinda don’t feel after you died and no punishment without feeling I suppose.
What if the families of the departed actively push for it?
Then, they should get mental treatment paid by convicted person, in my opinion. I bet that knowing that the convicted person got killed for it, doesn’t make the pain go away. There are other strategies needed to make a relatively normal live possible for the suffering persons.
I’ll never understand that perspective but thanks for trying to explain it.
What is the usefulness of punishment? Genuinely, what value does it have to society?
Crazy how different the response is to this on .ml vs .world
Way less bloodlust
