• @Moonrise2473@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    345 months ago

    This is huge and not like what happened last month.

    Last month they removed access to “Deadly Dentists | Season 1” and similar shows that are also broadcasted 24/7 everywhere on TV, so not too many people “purchased” them.

    But for anime the chance that a big fan is losing access to a massive collection of titles paid thousands of dollars is much higher.

    Sony didn’t learn from the backlash that happened less than two months ago???

  • Jo Miran
    link
    fedilink
    24
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    That image choice by Ars Technica was no coincidence.

  • @PoliticalCustard@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    14
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Piracy sites are now very often the best archive sites; if you are into old and/or obscure films very often your only choice is to go to piracy sites. Same used to be the case for music with what.cd - what an amazing musical archive that was. I still miss what.cd. Until corporations figure out a way to offer such archives, piracy will continue to grow as more and more content becomes unavailable because these corporate digital libraries are being taken away.

    • @knfrmity@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      45 months ago

      Corporations will never offer such archives, as they’re a money losing proposition. In some cases IP and copyright law is even such that content can’t be realistically archived and provided.

      • @PoliticalCustard@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        25 months ago

        Yeah, I think the same. Good news for piracy… but sad that people will have to rely on trackers that can disappear at any time and without warning. Mind you copyright does expire… but I have no idea how that would work. Project Gutenberg for media with large file sizes would be expensive to run… but then storage may continue to get cheaper. But yeah, it won’t be a corporate that will be offering a solution.

        • @knfrmity@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          65 months ago

          Copyright expires long after unprofitable content has been all but lost forever, something like 100 years after the death of the original creator. It used to be a far shorter period, but US corporations with big profitable IP holdings keep bribing lawmakers to extend it, and force its enforcement outside of the US as well. The concept of being able to sell copyrights is also quite silly if you ask me.

          So unfortunate Gutenberg and similar libraries can only have really old stuff as things stand.

    • loathesome dongeater
      link
      fedilink
      English
      35 months ago

      I still miss what.cd

      Isn’t there a site called redacted that is meant to replace it? I remember failing the interviews for it.

      • @PoliticalCustard@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        35 months ago

        Yeah, weirdly enough I just found it after remembering how good what.cd was. I have seen that the interview asks about transcoding… so yeah… might have to do some learning 'fore I have a go at an interview. I guess if the bar to entry is high then that is probably a good thing. I think I only got into what.cd because I met someone who had an invite.

  • @20inmyhead@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    75 months ago

    Sony is shit for doing this, however if you buy streaming content thinking you’re going to have access to it forever you’re kidding yourself. Businesses will supply streaming content for as long as it’s profitable to do so. When that profit evaporates so does your content.