Amazing photo! Sweetie looks so suave and stylish with their chest fur collar

Yeah … I’m one of those people who like the way they work now. I really hope that the current behavior will still be achievable in the new system.

This isn’t Gnome! You don’t need to worry.

My cheeks clap when I walk so yes, I expect princess treatment

Ich hab vor kurzem mal Shampoo probiert, und meine Haare sahen schrecklich aus. Haben ganz viel Volumen verloren. Jetzt nehme ich wieder mein Pfirsich-Duschgel, und es ist wieder herrlich voluminös!

Jetzt sehen meine Haare wieder so aus:

Woah, I had no idea! I’m not sure how well he’ll work in a standalone movie, but I’m excited to see at least!

Oh, that’s a kind of treat. Basically a paste in long tubes of packaging that you squeeze out. Most cats go nuts for it!

Reiche ist zu dieser Legislaturperiode, was Klöckner zur letzten CDU-geführten Periode war.

It’s my headcanon that the Skull Tyrant attacking Bone Bottom is a result of the scent of the skull Hornet brings back!

More accurate:

Metal guys: “Hey cool shirt”

I agree regarding his content, the few times I accidentally landed on his videos were met with instant regret. But he did a pretty good job as a VA in Dispatch!

Well, except for his hunger for tubes. But hunger is just the greed of the stomach, so it all works out

Fuck yeah, I can’t wait for more Hobie!

Well, that’s a pretty useless approach for tech discussions, because this kind of attack is explicitly not possible on Firefox.

Also, extrapolating such a broad statement from the simple fact that it’s possible to unreliably detect the presence of a single broad category of extensions is a huge reach.

All your underwear is crotchless? u nasty

Nutzername prüft aus

Because it would look much more weird to walk around naked, except for your butt?!

Isn’t that just Valhalla?

My god, that’s a beautiful animation

You can see if an ad is served and displayed or not

This doesn’t tell you which specific extensions a user has installed. First, the filter lists are mostly shared between ad blockers, so you can at best tell that some adblock extension is installed, but not which one. Second, the ad might fail to load for a variety of other reasons (e.g. user is offline, firewall blocking URLs/endpoints, network-level DNS adblock, …), so all you can tell is that the user might have an adblock extension installed. That’s far milder than your initial premise: “My point is that any assumption that your extensions are not detected is a delusion[…]”

you can detect if an iteraction was originated by an user or automatic

Sure, and how does this help with detecting the installed extensions? Knowing that the click event wasn’t triggered by the user doesn’t tell you who triggered it.

you can see if letters were pasted or input at a speed no human can match

Again, how does this help with detecting the installed extensions?

It is absolutely a secret! Based on the discussions I’ve seen, many people in the field were quite surprised that this technique works. So just like Meta’s recent-ish WebRTC scandal, this was a secret, even if the code always showed what it does.

My point is that any assumption that your extensions are not detected is a delusion

It is? How are these websites detecting my Firefox extensions?