Hearing all those secondary explosions was pretty cool.

Theyre going to really struggle if they ever wanted to make an iPhone app with that policy lol.

Seriously?!?! 😲

Who are we kidding that number is outdated at this point. Probably 40% now given the increase in ridiculous bugs.

I vaguely recall it was something very offensive, but cant remember what.

Even Russia takes prisoners…

Its how you get your own people back in trades…

Checks and balances?

Do you mean check marks on my balance sheet for each billion dollar row?

Soon your OS will get into a never ending loop with the browser and the website.

I like your dam analogy, I think its one of the better ones ive seen on this topic.

Quick, we need a 5000000% tarrif on US goods, its a national emergency!

If anyone wants to watch an interesting and odd movie kinda about Banksy, check out ‘Exit through the gift shop’

This kinda thing worries me a little if the tides of battle change and Russia can get access do it.

I hope they have a way to quickly take it down.

Ya, that does seem like a fair way to handle something like that.

Is that actually how it happens, or is it typically done internally and decided by a judge/prosecutor/police?

I never said that was enough for lethal force, but there are reasons a cop will shoot someone in the back and it be valid.

You kinda keep dodging what I’m talking about, which is if the person has shown to be a actual threat to the public.

There are rules around it, I just don’t know what that threshold is.

I’m not saying this was met in this case, but I am saying they CAN shoot someone who’s running away in some circumstances. (edit: without having to even be pointing the gun at the cop)

edit: My bad also you aren’t the same person replying to me, so you aren’t repeatedly dodging anything.

Simply possessing a gun absolutely not, but there are rules and exceptions for example on if they have shot at innocent people during the altercation already.

I’m just not sure where that line is, but it does exist.

edit: Like, shooting at innocent people during the alternation might not be enough even, it might need to be shooting at innocent people while fleeing.

Even if there was no gun pointing backwards and he just had the gun, if the person fleeing has shown they are willing to use it, isn’t that enough reason to fear for the saftey of others and take the shot?

I know there’s some line where that becomes okay, but not sure when/where.

I thought God was Alanis Morissette?

You could plug the bluetti into wall power and while there is wall power it runs off that like a UPS.

That setup I believe would also use solar while it was producing, but the moment solar was gone it’d switch to the house power.

If the overall load is more than house power can give via an outlet (you could add a beefier outlet if the bluetti supports higher inputs) it’d start draining the battery.

I dont know if bluettis software says use solar / battery only until battery is 10% kinda thing so this might not be optimized to use solar properly.

Edit: just realized someone else was the one who mentioned bluetti, and not OP, but this is doable with other systems too.

And russia may not even possess the tech required to replace them at this point.

Even more likely after they blew up Russia’s 2nd largest microchip facility last week or whenever it was.

They aren’t necessarily all scrapping everything EV.

Ford for example wasn’t making money on their current EVs, and they realized they weren’t going to make enough money on them as designed so they started up a new program to build an EV from the ground up that can be profitable.

But they incurred billions in losses on their current offerings. Those losses do include learning though, so while the dollar losses are huge, the new EV program wouldn’t have the same knowledge base to work off of if they hadn’t done those first EVs.

So they’re writing those losses off, in the interim looking more at hybrids, while also still pursuing their new EV platform.

It’s still the wrong move IMO, they’re going to fall further behind by doing this, and the learning will slow, and there’s still no guarantee that the new platforms will be on time / profitable either possibly delaying things even further.