• 5 Posts
  • 1.87K Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 10th, 2025

help-circle











  • prettybunnys@piefed.socialtosolarpunk memes@slrpnk.netFeed your Neighbours
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    No my dude I do not think it’s wasting taxpayers money to follow ADA guidelines.

    It’s 403.5 which is for official use on government property, the ADA (as you’ve claimed to be an expert on) is a tangled web of guidelines. Some are laws, some are best practices and recommendations. If I can untangle, during my pipeline builds, the web and find guidance for residential instead of what the government dictates for its employees I will. Until then most guidance you’ll find online still mirrors what I’ve said.

    My point again is that yes your sidewalk meets the minimum requirements. It’s a shame it isn’t built more to what is the norm, but yes again “bare minimum has been met” Neat!

    What I find hilarious is how hard in the paint you’re going for those sidewalks, THEY EXCEED INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS but somehow barely meet ADA requirements

    Here, you deleted your response:

    It’s 403.5 just in a subsection you opted not to read. Again, I never said your sidewalks weren’t compliant I called out that them being the BARE MINIMUM isn’t some ideal you’re touting about how nice they are.

    Anyways, fuck right off friend




  • prettybunnys@piefed.socialtosolarpunk memes@slrpnk.netFeed your Neighbours
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    You’re just repeating what I’m saying from the opposite position.

    We’re calling that 36” bare minimum sidewalk tiny, and you’re taking umbrage to it. I’m saying it barely meets the requirement and you’re saying it meets the requirement so it’s sufficient. Yes, the same thing said differently except per you 60” sidewalks aren’t the norm which has everyone calling the ones you linked out.

    I live in a frost state. Im not interested in arguing what the requirement is since we both agreed it’s 36” you’re just arguing about the 60” landing requirement. Which is fine. I don’t care, sorry to twist your panties.


  • prettybunnys@piefed.socialtosolarpunk memes@slrpnk.netFeed your Neighbours
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I have 60” sidewalks in front of my house and all throughout my city.

    When sidewalks reduce to 32” they are required to have a passing zone of 60” minimum every 200’

    Maybe there’s a carve out for private communities, but your sidewalk here is definitely not ADA compliant.

    The PROWAG is even more stringent at 48” minimumsz



  • prettybunnys@piefed.socialtosolarpunk memes@slrpnk.netFeed your Neighbours
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    ADA compliance requires sidewalks less than 60” to have passing zones every 200 feet. Which is why USUALLY you’ll just have a 60” wide sidewalk. 36” is the bare minimum for ADA compliance. So. That.

    The one you’re showing would simply not be compliant in some states and unless they’re counting the driveways as “passing zones” idk how this meets ADA compliance