Ok then show me why.
Ok then show me why.
How should I know where somebody is and if you really feel trapped by your location, don’t try not to use force to escape, since any kind of violence is justified at that point.
And you’re not doing it. Why? Because you don’t fucking have to run like many people on the world right now do, because you still do find some kind of rest the way you are trapped.
You got two choices: Either you just carry on and stop commenting such nonsense just to make me angry or you can violently escape and disrupt US capitalism as much as you want which would be based, comrade.
Also on a side note in general for anybody reading, I just think that spraying “western propaganda” on anything you don’t like is entitled.
I sure as hell know that I don’t know anything, but I know that I don’t know enough to say that I do and this is why on toppics like NK and so on I don’t trust anybodies oppinion if it is not peer reviewed by multiple not related sources.
Ok insane internet person.
You really just want to make me mad, nothing else. What kind of fucked up way to live is that.
I just wanted to say that eventhough it sucks here I am still embracing my liberties to comment on any post with any oppinion as long as it does not directly hurt somebody.
How deranged must somebody be to not recognise this right?
I think Stoicism is just a smart way to describe doing nothing.
Camus Sisyphus is a better example in my oppinion but the best answer I can relate to is Nitzsches general existential philosophy, e.g. the Übermensch.
Stoicism is just accepting the fact that one can do nothing and therefore trying to ignore it. A lot of people cope with death like this.
Camus and Niztsche suggest that one should grow from the problem: Live happily either way embracing the problem (Camus) or growing because the problem and achieving a greater version of yourself.
Some time ago I heard that the anarchist cookbook is not recommended and one should use CIA instructions to manufacture improvised explosives etc.
Ok, if you all love north korea then why not live in it?
Fun fact: If you do, you’ll won’t be able to comment here, because they don’t allow shit on their internet there in NK, China or Ruissia.
Yeah this guy is nuts. In their comments under that post you can even see that they don’t understand anything about how your decision making changes when you grow up, which is precisely why underage can not consent.
This guy is either a child themselves (is themself a thing, lol?) or they just lack proper judgment, which is why people like them should be educated or should touch some grass next time they want to post a garbage take.
Ngl the character design is so fucking good in this gen.
Average AI prompt response be like
If Taylor Swift becomes politically relevant, I am going to shoot myself.
Nah, in 9/11 there died many innocent people (the event itself + the unjustified war after that), “just” hack wallstreet and/or blow up lots of American pipelines and you have more damage to those that deseve it than a 9/11.
True they have always listened.
And now it’s stored on discords servers as well.
Well at least Russia isn’t winning as well 🤷
You don’t even need a brain implant, just a fancy small mri-like grid on your head and about 20h of training an ai-model to let it recognise different words from brain activity.
If you don’t trust me: https://youtu.be/-HYbFm67Gs8?si=bhrXAhfMoM2da8Jh
It just takes time to get this to wor if you want to train words, it could be much much faster by just training the alphabet so that you might be able to think like you’re reading your own sentences.
Can anybody explain the context?
Lol I just noticed, that some of these lettes I have seen in my studies. (I’m studying computer sciences)
Yeah the problem I see with this argument is that of course in an idealised world it would make sense to ban parts of the internet just like banning some kinds of oppinions is based irl.
But I think on the internet is a lot of garbage that has to be there so that people see it, because without allowing some garbage there is no discussion, no new values nor freedom.
I think any kind of left leaning ideology should enable non violent discourse as much as possible. Of course that would mean banning really bad things, but it would not mean complete restriction.
Also as a side note: Banning something does not kill the presence of it in society. In most cases it makes the issue worse than it is: You need more than just a ban, you need to convince people that you’re right, not force them into beliving.
This is why fact based propaganda is valuable and a great way to stop populism.