• Hugohase
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    I don’t agree with you but either way that doesn’t change the fact that nuclear is just slow, expensive and a bad idea in 2024.

    • PunnyName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      How is nuclear a bad idea? It’s one of the best options. Sure it’s slow and expensive, but once it’s up and running, it’s safe, and even less radioactive than coal.

      • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Because solar and wind can be deployed much faster. You rather easily have a decade of extra coal or gas emissions, if you built nuclear today.

          • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Sure, but why would you built a nuclear power plant, when you are faster in having a clean grid with wind and solar. The workers building the npp could built more wind and solar after all.

          • imgcat@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            No. The total amount of money available for energy research and construction is a given amount. If it’s better spent on solar and wind that’s it.