• FiskFisk33
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    Without examples it’s hard to say anything at all beyond guesses really.

    But if the article is about a xitter meme, tweets are the original source, and therefore perfectly relevant citations.

    • drathvedro@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      The most obvious example I know of is this one. Not a thing, never was a thing, and the entire page is just folk from 196 and blahaj dunking on wikipedia. And check out the talk page where they try to pretend that the skeleton image is the best representation of said “phenomenon”, while simultaneously removing any messages doubting it’s existence.

      • FiskFisk33
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I dunno, it doesn’t seem to overstate its case

        While not all films, television shows, photographs, and music videos that use this lighting intend to portray bisexuality, many queer artists have deliberately used this color palette

        It also uses sources such as Vice and the BBC

        I wouldn’t call it a high quality article, like at all, but I also wouldn’t call it factually incorrect.

        • drathvedro@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          many queer artists have deliberately used this color palette

          [Citation needed]

          There were definitely none that did before the wiki article was created.

          It also uses sources such as Vice and the BBC

          The article from BBC is fluff written by a rando and is based completely off twitter circlejerk. VICE is not a reliable source as anyone can register as an author and make articles there.