• FiskFisk33
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    24 days ago

    hmm, how would the receiving instance verify? what happens if I send 100 random hashes?

    • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      24 days ago

      This is literally already a problem. I can easily set up an instance and write a simple bot which just spams votes with randomized user strings. There are generally a bunch of these functional vulnerabilities in the AP trust model which are only mitigated by the current lack of scale. Work needs to be put into reworking the trust model, not exposing user telemetry to even more people.

      • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        24 days ago

        I can easily set up an instance and write a simple bot which just spams votes with randomized user strings.

        Well you can do that for a little bit, until your instance gets found out and it gets defederated. And you need to pay for a new domain if you want to do it again. So the current system actually makes it cost real money to do this spam you’re talking about.

      • FiskFisk33
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 days ago

        well, since the voting is public it’s easy to remove your votes and block your instance after the fact

    • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      Each instance could store a static private key used to encrypt all usernames in that instance maybe?