• nxdefiant
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 years ago

    Quite the opposite. If you read more, you might be less inclined to believe that.

    • Gelcube69@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      I’ve been reading anarchist literature for nearly 20 years. Please enlightened me on where you got this well established definition that you definitely didn’t just make up on a whim.

      • nxdefiant
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 years ago

        Well that makes two of us, feel free to share yours.

          • cristo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            Esperanto
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 years ago

            Bruh that is such a poor definition of anarchy lmao. Its been changed and molded to fit a utopian idealist view. In reality, anarchy is nothing like what the wikipedia article says, to say otherwise is willful ignorance

            • Gelcube69@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 years ago

              It’s a nearly 200 year old political philosophy, what do you mean changed and molded? It’s almost as old as the United States.

              It’s the first definition that comes up if you search on any search engine. You’ll find it in hard copies of encyclopedias if you really want to. It’s quite literally THE established definition.