• Chetzemoka
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    9 months ago

    He doesn’t have a bully pulpit yet. Republicans barely control the House and the Senate is gridlock 50/50. Give him a supermajority and see what he can get done

    • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      If you have a supermajority, you don’t need to use the bully pulpit. The bully pulpit is the outsized microphone that a president has to rally support and make his (or her, someday) point.

      • Chetzemoka
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        You have to be able to back it up with real legislative threats to be a bully pulpit. A president with no legislative cooperation can say whatever they want, but when everyone knows they can’t do anything, corpos will just laugh it off. Bully pulpit is really when you have enough power to be able to say, “You fix this or else we’ll fix it for you.”

        • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          The bully pulpit in Roosevelt’s mind wasn’t about pummeling legislators with presidential authority; rather, he believed the president could encourage the public to push their legislators on behalf of his agenda. - source

          Not using the bully pulpit as president to push your agenda is almost malfeasance. If he has votes/support, there is no need for it.

          • Chetzemoka
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            He needs more than words. Words alone are useless. But believe what you want

              • Chetzemoka
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                9 months ago

                And I think you seem to be unaware of how much the presidency has changed since Roosevelt’s time. I don’t think it’s realistic to think Biden has the kind of influence just by existing that Roosevelt did. Minimally, Roosevelt was working with two Congressional parties who actually wanted what was best for the country who were capable of being ashamed. Biden… doesn’t have that.

                Like, imagine for three seconds Biden threatening some of the things Roosevelt did. There’s just no way:

                "Never before had a President threatened “to seize and operate a major industry”

                http://www.let.rug.nl/usa/essays/1901-/theodore-roosevelts-broad-powers-erin-ruth-leonard.php