• @ByteWizard@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -29 months ago

        Sure, but the hope is a result of the first two issues.

        They can’t do the math so they think there is a chance. And because they WANT there to be a chance they ignore every time they lose.

        • @ladicius@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          69 months ago

          I know you have a point, a good one, Lotteries cater to the vulnerable etc. - but you are wrong in one aspect: There are winners, in every lottery, and that’s what fuels the hope.

          Even small chances are chances. It’s that simple ;)

          • @ByteWizard@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            19 months ago

            When did I say there weren’t any winners? I said people think there’s a chance that they might win personally. And you can state the gamblers fallacy any way you like, the fact that there are winners in a lottery has nothing to with the chances of winning personally. Bad at math, bad at logic, too emotional, call it anything you like. Any hope is a result of these flaws, not the cause.

            https://www.palomar.edu/users/bthompson/Gambler's Fallacy.html

              • @InfiniWheel@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                39 months ago

                Honestly, chances might be extremely low. But if all it takes is a couple of bucks sometimes to maybe win even 1000, I’d take it.

    • @Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      19 months ago

      Ah, my bread and butter… Thrill-seeking rich folk with a poor grasp of statistics and probability.

      Manny Calavera, travel agent.