Disclaimer: I’m not making fun of queer people, I’m making fun of the acronym.

  • Stametsdeleted by creator
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    deleted by creator

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 years ago

      I get the criticism, but most countries are not in the term “The United Nations” either. It feels possible to make a grouped, organized label that supports minority sexuality groups and opposes bigotry.

      • Stametsdeleted by creator
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        deleted by creator

    • Acinonyx@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 years ago

      Also why I throw the whole thing out and just call us all something else.

      true equality would either be just ‘+’, without any letters, or including every letter, which seems impossible.

      or like you said, something completely else. I personally like - hear me out - ‘alphabet people’. I understand that rightoids use this term as an insult so it isn’t usable, which is a shame, because apart from its negative connotation it has a few nice upsides:

      • sexualities/genders are being abbreviated by single letters already and since the alphabet contains all letters, everyone is included

      • ‘people’ is completely neutral towards everyone as well