• Schwim Dandy
      link
      fedilink
      436 months ago

      Nobody can even state that it’s actually happening “for competitive browsers” as even Chrome users are reporting an unexplained lag/slowdown. At this point, it’s just wild speculation and bandwagoning.

      • LoafyLemon
        link
        fedilink
        106
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        You absolutely can tell what’s happening by reading the source code. They are using a listener and a delay for when ontimeupdate promise is not met, which timeouts the entire connection for 5 full seconds.

        https://pastebin.com/TqjzbqQE

        • Schwim Dandy
          link
          fedilink
          176 months ago

          I’m sorry but I don’t see how that check is browser-specific. Is that part happening on the browser side?

          • @PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            296 months ago

            They don’t need to put incriminating “if Firefox” statements in their code – the initial page request would have included the user agent and it would be trivial to serve different JavaScript based on what it said.

            • @phx@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              266 months ago

              Easy enough to test though. Load the page with a UA changer and see if it still shows up when Firefox pretends to be Chrome

              • @TastehWaffleZ@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                28
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                The video in the linked article does just that. The page takes 5 seconds to load the video, the user changes the UA, they refresh the page and suddenly the video loads instantly. I would have liked to see them change the UA back to Firefox to prove it’s not some weird caching issue though

              • @PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                16 months ago

                I don’t know, nor am I speculating. The person I was replying to said they didn’t see a browser check in the code, which isn’t enough to dismiss it.

        • Karyoplasma
          link
          fedilink
          96 months ago

          Well, at least I learned that javascript understands exponential notation. I never even bothered to try that lol

      • BolexForSoup
        link
        fedilink
        23
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        It’s not wild speculation as there is compelling, if incomplete, evidence. And to describe everyone’s reaction as “bandwagoning” is ridiculous. Firefox and Mullvad are my daily drivers. This directly impacts me. The fediverse is going to have a disproportionate number of non-chrome users.

        • Schwim Dandy
          link
          fedilink
          06 months ago

          I also use FF solely and have no slowdowns on YT. I guess they like my copy of the browser.

          • BolexForSoup
            link
            fedilink
            11
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            I’ve duplicated it on 4 machines across 3 OS’s (windows 11, macOS, steamOS). Glad you got lucky. I’m sure you’re also familiar with A/B testing but if not I’m happy to explain it.

            It is absolutely possible there is a reasonable explanation but for you to say 1) nothing is happening and 2) it’s “bandwagoning” is, again, ridiculous. Especially if your evidence is “well mine is fine,” which is not acceptable troubleshooting procedure.

          • Karyoplasma
            link
            fedilink
            86 months ago

            Not all regions are served with the same scripts. That’s why the ad-block pop-up was shown for some users but not for others or at a later time for others. This also affected the update cycle of those anti-adblock scripts.

            The reason for that is quite simple. New stuff is rolled out to only some users at first as some sort of beta testing procedure. If many people complain about functionality issues and all of those have the new version of the script, Google knows there is something wrong with it.

          • Aradina [She/They]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            16 months ago

            “works fine on my machine lol” is unhelpful and useless.

            It’s very well known that Google makes heavy use of a/b testing. They did it with the adblock block and they’re doing it with this

            • Schwim Dandy
              link
              fedilink
              16 months ago

              “It happens all the time” and “they always do *” is also comically unhelpful and useless. I’m getting a pot/kettle vibe from those that seem to take offense at my comment.

      • @Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        -76 months ago

        There’s been multiple posts pointing to some possibly “wait for ads to finish loading” type code. It’s quite possible that it’s just bugged in Firefox etc since browsers are horrendously inconsistent etc.

        But that doesn’t make a cool headline so instead the “it’s Google being evil” story is the popular one.

        • @sibachian@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          196 months ago

          it was already made public in the lawsuit some weeks ago that they are indeed slowing down youtube for firefox.

          • @Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Source?

            I’ve read a lot on this and never saw any conclusive claim here.

            There were claims many years ago by Mozilla about this, and it had to do with slow APIs in Mozilla that YouTube was using…

            There’s also been many known performance issues in a lot of the APIs/libraries Google/YouTube use on Mozilla for many years. And Mozilla just hasn’t been able to keep up.

            I don’t see anything about this in recent history, because everything is just floods of people complaining about this round, with still no conclusive evidence that this is happening intentionally. YouTube is currently on a ad-block-blocker crusade and their code keeps changing and there’s nothing to conclusively indicate that this is malice and not just a bug in the way Mozilla performs.

            So as much as everyone seems happy to burn the witch because of poor performance, I’m not ready to jump to that conclusion until there’s actually evidence of this being intentional. Especially when this smells a lot like a long standing different problem. “Someone said they are” is not going to convince me. Especially if you can’t even point to that someone saying that thing.

    • auth
      link
      fedilink
      -446 months ago

      Where’s the proof? Note: I didn’t read the article

        • auth
          link
          fedilink
          -2
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          no thanks… I havent had any issues… been using firefox since v1.0

              • BolexForSoup
                link
                fedilink
                6
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                I mean you’re saying you want proof, don’t read the article, then say you don’t care because it works for you. Do you not understand why that’s a little perplexing? Anyway, I’ve said my piece. I don’t imagine it will be a very productive discussion. Have a good week.

      • @SheeEttin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        96 months ago

        Don’t worry, there isn’t proof in the article either. There’s a snippet of code out of context, and a video that, while it shows a loading delay, doesn’t show the code being executed.

      • @4lan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        How short are our attention spans that we make judgments based on things we didn’t read?

        Get off TikTok It’s breaking your brain

        You can literally see it for yourself. Download Firefox, download Chrome. It will literally take you 5 minutes to test this out