Just seems like everything is “this company did this to their employees” and less about “this novel messaging protocol offers these measured pros and cons.” Or similar

And yes, I could post things, but I’m referring to what hits the top, 12h.

Can anyone rec communities with less of a biz and politics and wfh vs in-office vibe?

  • Corgana
    link
    English
    3
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I won’t dispute that fanboyism is thing, but also I don’t think many evangelists as it were view Linux as a “silver bullet”, just as the most ethical option given the alternatives. And they feel very strong feelings about this, that come across as Weird and Scary to people not used to seeing software treated with the same enthusiasm as politics.

    Also, I should add that many view open source software as having the potential to one day be the “silver bullet” in a way commercial software can never be due to it’s structure.

    • @Quicky@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      35 months ago

      I’ve been reading about its potential for a long time. Maybe next year will be the year of Linux ;)

      • Corgana
        link
        English
        45 months ago

        If your barometer for “potential” relies on market share, then you don’t really understand what motivates a person to contribute effort to a FOSS project in the first place.

        • @Quicky@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          35 months ago

          What’s your barometer, bearing in mind you said it had the potential to be a silver bullet? Silver bullet for what?

          I don’t want to sound defensive, but please don’t assume I’m not invested in FOSS. I’m on Lemmy, Mastodon, Pixelfed and am the developer of half a dozen small FOSS projects on GitHub.

          • Corgana
            link
            English
            -1
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Silver bullet for what?

            At achieving the task it was designed for. I do not think it’s correct to say that Linux can have “market share” in the market of commercial operating systems because it isn’t commercial software. By not using proprietary software we are exiting the market.

            • @Quicky@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              3
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Linux absolutely does not exist “outside the market”, that’s absurd. Red Hat, Canonical, SUSE etc aren’t charitable organisations. These major contributors to the Linux kernel aren’t doing so out of love for their fellow man.

              For you, yes, Linux is “free” if your measurement of cost is purely financial outlay.

              There’s a great back and forth here, and the original thread on Mastodon, which nicely covers both the evangelism (my original issue) and the “cost” of Linux. There’s plenty of reactions in there from people talking about the same things, from both sides of the coin.

              FOSS