Meta just announced that they are trying to integrate Threads with ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, etc.). We need to defederate them if we want to avoid them pushing their crap into fediverse.

If you’re a server admin, please defederate Meta’s domain “threads.net

If you don’t run your own server, please ask your server admin to defederate “threads.net”.

      • @Snapz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        157 months ago

        This was being discussed actively months ago. People would say the full embrace, extend… then, but now there’s a somewhat fair assumption that most who are actually on Lemmy might have the reference by now.

        All you have to do is say, "what does EEE mean? " without the second half of your statement - no need to get angry.

        • @morphballganon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          127 months ago

          The point of the second half is to try to dissuade others from simply relying on initialisms. It causes introspection. Maybe accusing others of being angry is uncalled for? It’s possible to want to prompt introspection in others without being angry.

          • @ttmrichter@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            26 months ago

            The problem is you come across as a demanding jackass and will likely receive a “fuck you” in response rather than the modified behaviour you think you’re engendering.

          • @LemmysMum@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -6
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Using initialisms prompt self learning for those that will, and wilful ignorance for those that will not. No one is responsible for anyone elses individual lack of capacity. Funny how your situation only encourages introspection in one half of the conversation.

            • @sirfancy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              What is the point of ever asking a question on the Internet if it should always just be met with “do your own research”? For the record, I did Google around and I couldn’t find that Wikipedia article, and when I did see it in another comment, I didn’t still understand the concept. This comes across as incredibly gatekeeper-y. Don’t understand why I’m not “allowed” into the conversation because I’m being barred from context because I don’t understand an initialism and my research failed.

              • @LemmysMum@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                16 months ago

                You are allowed, just ask what it means. Don’t be a whiney little bitch that people aren’t hand feeding you every scrap of information, nobody is cognizant of your ignorance so don’t blame yours on them.

    • Mario_Dies.wav
      link
      fedilink
      English
      307 months ago

      I don’t believe the people saying “just wait and see” are genuine users. I have a hard time fathoming that after Meta’s atrocious history, as well as the history of what happens when large corporations get involved – I simply can’t believe these are more than paid shill accounts.

      Or maybe I’m the one who’s naive, thinking that people can’t possibly be so foolish…

    • Corgana
      link
      English
      157 months ago

      You’d be a moron to trust them obv, but how would Threads using ActivityPub extingush the Fediverse?

        • Black616Angel
          link
          fedilink
          English
          207 months ago

          Embrace, Extend, Extinguish

          1. Embrace:

          They implement ActivityPub and connect to all the available servers. A load of new users will see the content here and all the communities here will be absolutely flooded with new content and users.

          2. Extend:

          ActivityPub will be extended. Many new features will be added, that don’t really match the standard, but they are mostly useful so some developers will try to add them to let’s say Lemmy. They won’t be blr to develop new features on their own and some stuff with threads will always be broken or half baked. Threads users will belittle the users here, some will maybe go there, cause it just works and is otherwise the same.
          New users at the same time will most likely go directly to threads cause it’s backed by a giant company, always works and has more features.

          3. Extinguish:

          They will cut the federation.
          Communities here will feel empty and most users will just leave. Only the hard core will stay and that won’t be sustainable. The fediverse becomes even less attractive for new users and will devolve into a niche community.

        • squiblet
          link
          fedilink
          107 months ago

          Throw 50 fulltime programmers at development and crowd everyone else out. Or fork it with something clearly superior since they can afford to pay people to work on it fulltime.

          • @asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            37 months ago

            What does “crowd everyone else out” mean specifically here? People could still choose to use non-Threads ActivityPub apps.

            • squiblet
              link
              fedilink
              57 months ago

              I mean development. It’s happened with other projects before when large corps get involved. Of course, the existing developers of a project don’t have to allow that to happen.

          • Corgana
            link
            English
            17 months ago

            Fork Mastodon? You mean like Threads?

        • Corgana
          link
          English
          17 months ago

          Right, I’ve also yet to see what defederating from a hypthetical Threads instance could prevent.

    • @Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      26 months ago

      They’re a really good open source contributor with a great track record, I know people don’t like saying good stuff about zuck related things but they’ve helped progress machine learning quite a bit. Pytourch is a great example iirc used in stable diffusion

    • @PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -127 months ago

      DECADES long? Facebook didn’t even exist 2 decades ago bud. We know they’re shit but you don’t need to go around exaggerating everything and being so dramatic.

      • squiblet
        link
        fedilink
        187 months ago

        Please. Per wikipedia

        Created in 2004 by Mark Zuckerberg with four other Harvard College students and roommates

        Okay, 19 1/2 years. Hope that’s more pleasing to you.