Original link

If people aren’t panicked, they wouldn’t elect panic-pandering politicians, so there must always be a panic — crime, drugs, commies, libruls, etc.

  • Melllvar
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    That’s not really my point, is it?

    • elephantium@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 years ago

      Well, what is your point? If we can’t trust the statistics we do have “because police are just making them up”, then … we know nothing at all about crime levels? That doesn’t seem helpful. You must have some idea of what could be done better.

      • Melllvar
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 years ago

        Exactly what I said. That the data is thin.

        you must have some idea of what could be done better.

        If I don’t, does that invalidate my point? Does the cited data become more reliable somehow?