One of Donald Trump’s lawyers appeared to accidentally admit that the former president may have engaged in insurrection.

Christina Bobb, a vocal 2020 election denier, tried to argue Tuesday night that voters should be able to elect anyone they want for president.

“The president is elected by the entire nation, and it should be the entire nation who determines who they want for president, whether they are guilty of insurrection or not,” Bobb said during an interview on Real America’s Voice. “It’s up to the people.”

Bobb seems to be arguing that even an insurrectionist should be allowed to run the country, which could be seen as an admission of guilt.

  • Melllvar
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    “The president is elected by the entire nation, and it should be the entire nation who determines who they want for president, whether they are guilty of insurrection or not,” Bobb said during an interview on Real America’s Voice. “It’s up to the people.”

    When was the last time a Republican won the popular vote?

    • MimicJar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      6 months ago

      2004, Bush’s second term. Which, electorally speaking, wasn’t that long ago.

      Of course the 2016 and 2000 elections both saw Republican candidates win the presidency, but not the popular vote.

      The 2000 election is also special since it came down to a judicial decision and was a 0.5% difference.

      The 2016 election however is more clear, since it was a 2% difference.

      Also keep in mind this had never happened before. So 2000 was when we should have started to take action, but since every election after (until 2016) it went back to normal, it made 2000 look like an outlier.

      Which is all a long was of saying https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Popular_Vote_Interstate_Compact is probably the answer here.

        • Melllvar
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          It’s telling that no member of the Supreme Court was willing to put their name on that decision.