• mozz
    link
    fedilink
    49
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    “I don’t think we would so lightly throw around the term ‘innocent Nazi civilians’ during World War II.”

    Not that this is at all the point of any of this, but yes we very much fucking would, and did. Ministers in the UK government pushed back against Churchill’s desire to bomb German civilians in retaliation for the bombing of London, saying it would “put us on the same plane morally as they are.” Eventually of course there was bombing of non-military targets in Germany, including the infamous firebombing of Dresden, and the British war government faced some fiery criticism at home because they were killing innocent people, and many of the British people understood that deliberately killing innocent people isn’t a part of legitimate war strategy, whatever it is that the guilty people were doing that you’re “retaliating” for.

    • @PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      85 months ago

      Yeah but we’re talking about the US here and uhh…

      Inconspicuously steps in front of footage of the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki

      • prole
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        You fool, that footage is playing on a projector! Stepping in front of it merely made it larger and displayed it on your chest and penis.

    • @lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I think it’s also worth pointing out the inherent falseness of the analogy. They were innocent German civilians, not Nazi civilians. By equating Germans with Nazis, Mast is equating Palestinians with Hamas.

    • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
      link
      fedilink
      25 months ago

      LordHardThrasher has been doing an excellent series on YouTube on the failures of the Allied bombing campaign, and why it shows democracies are better than dictatorships.