@silence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.netEnglish • 3 months agoIs nuclear energy the answer? Probably notwww.theclimatebrink.comexternal-linkmessage-square4fedilinkarrow-up132arrow-down110
arrow-up122arrow-down1external-linkIs nuclear energy the answer? Probably notwww.theclimatebrink.com@silence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.netEnglish • 3 months agomessage-square4fedilink
minus-square@NoiseColorlink5•3 months agoNuclear probably isn’t. It could be, but it doesn’t look like its going to be.
minus-square@tinwhiskers@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink1•3 months agoYeah, you’d need to produce 2 nuclear power stations per week to keep up with growth in solar alone. It’s going to have a part to play, but it’s ever slipping into irrelevance.
Nuclear probably isn’t. It could be, but it doesn’t look like its going to be.
Yeah, you’d need to produce 2 nuclear power stations per week to keep up with growth in solar alone. It’s going to have a part to play, but it’s ever slipping into irrelevance.