• Th4tGuyII
        link
        fedilink
        642 months ago

        I was genuinely confused by this statistic until I realised it was a double negative. YouTube losen’t Google a lot of money.

        • HopeOfTheGunblade
          link
          fedilink
          262 months ago

          Yeah, sorry, sometimes I can’t help my need to play with language, when given the slightest chance.

        • HopeOfTheGunblade
          link
          fedilink
          42 months ago

          Yeah, unfortunately I couldn’t find revenue numbers. It seems unlikely to be costing that much to host. I’d be really surprised to learn it isn’t cash positive at this point.

          • LordWarfire
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 months ago

            Best I could find is the entire division makes about 35% profit and you’d have to assume some of that was YouTube

      • @SomeGuy69@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        And as we know companies prefer to provide a service with a loss, for decades. Name a company that can make -31.5 billion and keep going. Or maybe the data went to google, where they made the money.

        • HopeOfTheGunblade
          link
          fedilink
          42 months ago

          Not made -31.5 billion. Lost -31.5 billion. As in they brought in that much, not cost it.

      • @freebee@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        12 months ago

        Do they somehow calculate in this the value off the youtube harvested user data that serves other Google branches? No, right?