• Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    5 months ago

    Technically, yes, everything is political if you make it political. But you have to make it political first. Petting your cat isn’t inherently political unless you bring up the government policies and economical structures that allow you to own the cat in the first place, or compare your attitude towards the cat to a political stance, or something else of that ilk.

    In the same way, everything is scientific if you study it scientifically, and everything is theological if you consider it from a theological perspective. It’s technically true, but that doesn’t make it useful. It says more about the way you think than the nature of reality, especially as politics are a social construct.

    • exocrinous
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      But you have to make it political first.

      No, the politics is there. You’re just in denial.

      • Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Politics are a social construct. Without political thought, there are no politics.

        • exocrinous
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          And that happened when the first chimpanzee achieved sapience at the start of 2001 a space oddity. From that point forward, everything was political. You can’t close Pandora’s Box, everything is political forever or until the human race dies out.

            • exocrinous
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              The field concerning group decision making and power within groups.

              • Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                That’s a sensible definition.

                Buttering your toast has nothing to do with that directly. You can make it political, yes, but if you say everything is political because you can talk about it from a political perspective, then I can say everything is theological because I can talk about it from a theological perspective.

                • exocrinous
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Most people butter their toast with cow butter, which requires the subjugation, forced impregnation, and sexual assault of cows, at least within modern processes for milk acquisition. You’re buttering that toast with slavery. You can close your eyes and go LA LA LA and pretend it’s not true, but it is. You paid someone to pay someone to pay someone to violate a sentient being.

                  You are participating in a group that made a decision you endorsed to trade suffering for toast. Toast that you could have made with plant butter, but chose not to. The group, the decision, and the suffering do not disappear just because you’re in denial. It’s political.

                  • Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    God created that cow, and the act of putting butter on toast is an act of creation, even if a small one, which we are prone to do because it is in our nature as beings created in the image of God, a creator. You can close your eyes and go LA LA LA and pretend it’s not true, but it is. You butter toast because it’s part of what God made you to do. The divine orchestration of the world and human nature doesn’t disappear just because you’re in denial. It’s theological.