Hatred often makes you want to hurt people, but people hurt peope in the name of greed more often, and not only with less potential for guilt, but is often the cause of delusional accolades and reassurance both from within oneself and from others.

Hypothetical:

A CEO lays off 10,000 employees that helped that company succeed, solely to increase earnings and not because the company is hurting, not only seriously hurting 9,997 people, but causing 3 to commit suicide.

A bumpkin gets in a fight with someone he hates the melanin of because he’s a moron and kills them.

Who did more damage to humanity that day? They’re both, I want to say evil but evil is subjective, they’re both highly antisocial, knowingly harmful behaviors, yet one correctly sends you to prison for a long time if not forever, while the other, far more premeditated and quite literally calculated act, is literally rewarded and partied about. Jim Kramer gives you a shout out on tv, good fucking times amirite!

Edit: and this felt relevant to post after someone tried to lecture me about equating layoffs to murder.

“Coca-Cola killed trade unionists in Latin America. General Motors built vehicles known to catch fire. Tobacco companies suppressed cancer research. And Boeing knew that its planes were dangerous. Corporations don’t care if they kill people — as long as it’s profitable.”

https://jacobin.com/2020/01/corporations-profit-values-murder-culture-boeing

  • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Hoards newspapers

    People harmed: themselves

    Society’s Verdict: Mentally ill

    Hoards capital

    People harmed: innumerable exploited employees deprived of receiving most of the value they produce.

    Society’s Verdict: virtuous job creator, titan of industry, esteemed member of the business community, role model

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Capital cannot be hoarded, or it loses value. The entire existence of capital is tied to its use.

      Jeff Bezos does not have a vault full of money

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Lmao it really isn’t. You have been lied to.

          If Bezos had a vault full of cash, he would be poor. His wealth is tied to his assets, and his biggest asset is the best logistics company in human history.

          Hate Bezos all ya want, but his wealth is not in cash or gold or any other hoardable thing.

          • Eldritch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Oh wow. Indoctrinated much? That’s literally all wrong. In fact the dictionary defines Capital as…

            wealth in the form of money or other assets owned by a person or organization or available or contributed for a particular purpose such as starting a company or investing.

            Bezos is found is literally in a lot of those horrible things. Granted there is a lot of perceived value in his company. But even if that went belly up today he would still be a wealthy man.