• PopOfAfrica@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Again, they are “left wingers” supporting far right regimes. Its not that big a consipracy

      • PopOfAfrica@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        No? Where on earth did i suggest they were.

        Modern Russia and China, however, are incredibly right wing, which hexbear users support full throatedly

        • mycorrhiza they/them@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Go ask them for their opinions about Russia and China. You’ll get unanimous agreement that Putin is a homophobic capitalist reactionary and Russia is not a socialist or left-wing state. For China, you’ll get disagreements, but most of the takes will be pretty nuanced either way. Some believe Deng’s reforms were necessary to avoid economic strangulation, others are deeply suspicious of the direction China is headed.

        • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          See, this is exactly what I mean by “I understand them so little that they must be the opposition in disguise”

          If you tried at all, youd understand that they’re position on “modern day Russia and China” is based on the idea of critical support. They evaluate policy decisions against “does this bring the working class closer to solidarity or not”.

          I.e. on the Ukraine war, their position is basically “U.S. Involvement in any war is a net-negative to worker solidarity in the country of question”. None there support Russia’s invasion, but they think Americas involvement spells the end of any socialist coalition to begin with.

          But again, “I understand them so little they must be a part of the opposition”. They have a different (definitively leftist) understanding of the war than you do. Doesn’t make them right-wing.

          • FaeDrifter@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            They evaluate policy decisions against “does this bring the working class closer to solidarity or not”.

            When it comes to Russia bombing their cities and raping their women and children, is that positively or negatively influencing working class solidarity?

            • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Negatively.

              When it comes to supplying lethal aid to Ukraine to continue the war, though, they’d also say negatively.

              For the record I don’t agree, but that is their position and I understand it.

              • FaeDrifter@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yeah, well when Hexbear hears that wives and daughters are being raped and says “giving Ukrainians weapons to help them defend their families from being raped is bad for worker solidarity”, it makes Hexbear look like a bunch of rape apologizists.

                • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I’m not sure why people are surprised that a group largely made up of ML leftists would have a flippant attitude toward geopolitical violence.

                  My main point is, still, that accusing them of being “right wing” just because you don’t understand their ideological stance is dumb.

                  • FaeDrifter@midwest.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Basically the only difference between ML and the alt-right is that the alt-right wants violence against “libtards”, and ML’s want violence against “shitlibs”, while being insufferably snobby about pretending to be morally superior because they didn’t use an abliest slur.

                    It’s like you just took a fascist and put them on a liberal’s moral high horse.