• Daxtron2
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    It doesn’t as the laws of physics as we currently know them break down at the scale and pressures involved in the very early universe.

    • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Alright but until you can create or destroy energy/matter then you have no evidence to back your claims or dispute mine.

      • Daxtron2
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        But that doesn’t make your claim provable

          • Daxtron2
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            A claim doesn’t need evidence to the contrary to be disputed, so no thats not what you said

            • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              I said it wasn’t proof, but that it was evidence. You can dispute a claim that has evidence but if you don’t have any evidence yourself you’re going to look like an idiot who ignores the most likely truth and instead clings to their faith.