• itsmikeyd@lemmy.mlM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Pisses me off no end that too. We have wet tyres, as long as there is enough visibility let them race.

    • Goatifi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well most of the time there isn’t any visibility. When it rains, its not problem that it is dangerous and drivers are scared to drive because it is slippery, but that visibility is 0, just look at onboards.

      • f0kus@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        The lack of visibility comes from how well the extreme wets disperse water. So it’s like a catch 22 either make worse tires for better visibility or better ties but drivers behind can’t see.

              • Barsukis@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                So then… Another in between Intermediate tyre? Like I get you are saying but you do realise that wet tyres are not much different from other tyres with the only exception being their pattern? I think at some point the differences become marginal.

        • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          that can’t be true. it if were they could just go back to the old wet tire designs where it wasn’t a problem.

          I think it’s more to do with the extreme aero on modern cars.

          • f0kus@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m no professional, but I’ve been watching F1 for most of my life and the water dispersion is definitely more than it was in the past.