Have a question

  • ImOnADiet@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    why would you title the post like this, it reads like bait, especially with an 18 day old hexbear account, random meme pic attached, and your actual question in the comments

    • TokenBoomer@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It is bait. I was just looking for opinions and insight. It was in jest, but I understand if people are irritated by it.

      • ImOnADiet@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        bait as in you’re just trying to piss us off and aren’t actually here in good faith to find out our opinions. Like actively trying to get banned.

  • TokenBoomer@hexbear.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have a limited understanding of theory, so take that into consideration. I have recently been researching geopolitics and world systems theory and trying to apply it to political economies. From my understanding, communism is achievable in simple societies, but difficult in complex societies. Complex societies tend to foster social hierarchies and authoritarianism due to their complexity. If anyone can give me their opinions I would appreciate it. Whether it’s an area for further study or someone else’s research.

    • ImOnADiet@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would just add on that authoritarianism is literally a meaningless term, in that every state is authoritarian. What matters is who holds the authority to do what. Read On Authority by Engels too, it’s super short and dunks on “tankie ebil authoritarianism” quite easily

      • TokenBoomer@hexbear.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sure. I meant authority in its broadest sense. I was hoping for more of a social psychology dynamic. But, as is being pointed out, others have been down this path before. If the answers lie in economic theory, that is where I’ll start.

        • ImOnADiet@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think you’re really just getting to the truth of what economics is. It’s how we as a society (i.e. socially) choose to distribute our resources. Because of this, we Marxists say that the “psychology” part of the dynamic you mention isn’t actually set in stone, because humans are affected by the society we live in, which directly ties into economics, ya know?

          • TokenBoomer@hexbear.netOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes, it’s difficult sometimes to step outside of the false consciousness of capitalism and imagine a world without it. I used to think that theory was a luxury, and socialism is just common sense. I’ve read some, but starting to understand it is impossible to world build without it.