Linkerbaan@lemmy.world to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 3 months agoOlympicsi.imgur.comimagemessage-square21fedilinkarrow-up160arrow-down1106
arrow-up1-46arrow-down1imageOlympicsi.imgur.comLinkerbaan@lemmy.world to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 3 months agomessage-square21fedilink
minus-squareprettybunnys@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·3 months agoNo, because a soldier wearing a patch is not the same as a soldier wearing the uniform which was what you said. You’re conflating two things here, the twitter account claims something stronger.
minus-squareLinkerbaan@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down7·edit-23 months agoAnd there it is another goalpost moved. The “Am Yisrael Chai” , project has raised $1.5 million to buy 4,000 tactical helmets, and 25,000 pieces of clothingincluding tactical uniforms, fireproof overalls, and winter gear, and is literally saving lives Surely now you concede
minus-squareprettybunnys@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·edit-23 months ago There have even been pictures of American-israeli soldiers proudly wearing their American uniform in Gaza. Your words. Did you mean “their American funded uniform” by your words or did you mean the uniform they own as an American service member? By context maybe this is a misunderstanding and you meant the former, however your words more directly state the latter. That is the only goalpost, your words. What did you mean by them? If it’s the former, and you meant their uniform funded by the USA then ok I misunderstood you. If it’s the latter then I still wait for you to provide any substance to back up your claim. Here on Lemmy where the points are so small anyone with critical thinking skills can see what’s being said here. We all see you.
minus-squareLinkerbaan@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down7·3 months agoI just linked you proof that debunks both your claims you just refuse to see it.
minus-squareprettybunnys@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·3 months agoSo I made no claims, I asked you to back up your claims. It’s telling you refuse to answer my simple question. I gave you an out.
No, because a soldier wearing a patch is not the same as a soldier wearing the uniform which was what you said.
You’re conflating two things here, the twitter account claims something stronger.
And there it is another goalpost moved.
Surely now you concede
Your words.
Did you mean “their American funded uniform” by your words or did you mean the uniform they own as an American service member?
By context maybe this is a misunderstanding and you meant the former, however your words more directly state the latter.
That is the only goalpost, your words. What did you mean by them?
If it’s the former, and you meant their uniform funded by the USA then ok I misunderstood you.
If it’s the latter then I still wait for you to provide any substance to back up your claim.
Here on Lemmy where the points are so small anyone with critical thinking skills can see what’s being said here. We all see you.
I just linked you proof that debunks both your claims you just refuse to see it.
So I made no claims, I asked you to back up your claims.
It’s telling you refuse to answer my simple question.
I gave you an out.