“Freedom of Speech, not Freedom of Reach - our enforcement philosophy which means, where appropriate, restricting the reach of Tweets that violate our policies by making the content less discoverable.”
Surprise! Our great ‘X’ CEO has brought back one more bad thing that we hated about twitter 1.0: Shadowbanning. And they’ve given it a new name: “Freedom of Speech, Not Reach”.
Perhaps the new approach by X is an improvement? At least they would “politely” tell you when you’re being shadow banned.
I think freedom of speech implies that people have the autonomy to decide what they want to see, rather than being manipulated by algorithm codes. Now it feels like they’re saying, “you can still have your microphone… We’re just gonna cut the power to it if you say something we don’t like”.
deleted by creator
“No one can act as a moderator to remove my content” This claim does align with with the principle of freedom of speech, but we have to admit that for now, complete freedom without any control can be unsafe. It could potentially lead to spams and political issues. However, the feature of not asking for phone numbers or email addresses sounds interesting, especially considering Elon is planning to introduce government ID verification.
Yo! I am on WireMin too, I am satisfied for now, even though the the message not working in real-notification, I guess its because of the decentralized structure, and they don’t have much users yet, so the network is not as stable as Signal or others, but I mean it is pretty secure right? I saw news about Tucker Carlson said the US National Security Agency hacked into his Signal account and read correspondence.
This is blatant advertisement. Doesn’t it violate the instance rules?
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Removed by mod
deleted by creator