• Maalus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      Plenty actually. Passing gun control laws because of how a gun looks for instance

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        As a Canadian: I’m so fucking tired of this. There’s no consistency in how firearms get banned except “feels”. The only consistency is that legal gun owners get blamed for illegal gun activities and lose something else every year.

      • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        3 months ago

        I remember when all scary black guns were banned and joe Biden came into my house with Barack and emptied out my gun case. There was not and has never been a US recall or forced return or anything of the like.

        It’s a scary bedtime story.

        That said, if there WERE a call to buyback scary black guns and if in any way made schools safer, for instance, I would happily sell mine back.

    • potatopotato@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Realistically they sell more guns than any other group. Every time they call for random bans everyone goes and empties every gun store within a 100 mile drive. Obviously there’s a lot more to it than that but both sides political rhetoric has been making the US small arms industry absolutely explode. We’re absolutely past the point where you could actually ban scary guns and have any effect. Half the country has more ARs than they know what to do with, literal piles in safes and dresser drawers, and they’ve gotten extremely comfortable with the concept of civil disobedience/non-compliance. Further, fuck 3d printing, every dude with access to a CNC is pumping out cheap lowers and suppressors so they can justify having an SOT (the ability to obtain or produce legal machine guns).

      If this is scary, the best and only course of action is reducing the temperature. Treat young men like they aren’t economic cannon fodder so they don’t feel like the only locus of control is fucking weaponry (fix housing, job security), positive intervention for crisis (don’t just send a hit squad of cops), and don’t be afraid to engage with rural populations (they’re intelligent humans too).

    • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      If they get their way, only 2/7 of my guns would be legal (the revolver and the 1953 lever action), so that would take 5 of mine personally. You are in denial if you think I’m going for that.

      • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Idk I just think to myself:

        Do I like my guns? Yes. Do I want to sell them? No.

        Do I value having all of the guns that I want MORE than I want affordable healthcare with price caps for insulin and women having choices in their reproductive health? More than public options with regulations for my my utilities? More than I value equality under the law for everyone, and not having the bible shoved up my ass in a way that friends my friends can’t get married or my sister can’t adopt?

        No. I don’t.

        It would suck if they were illegal and you had to sell, but no one is coming to knock on your door and take them, so surrender or move or whatever would be up to you. Not all democrats want Chicago style gun control.

          • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Is that not exactly what we were talking about?

            Disarm still is the wrong word because it’s never going to happen that there’s a door to door collection with house searches. Legality is where you went, and I followed I thought?

            Did you have a facet if the issue you wanted to circle back to?

            • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              Disarm is still thr right word if they don’t go door to door but instead offer prison sentances for failure to comply and surrender them. That’s literally how the actual 1930s nazis disarmed the jewish population of post weimar germany.

    • YeetPics@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Literally all the guns. I used to live in a converted .50 cal and the damn Democrats took it all. Now I’m homeless.

      Just kidding. I love watching insecure troglodytes tweak over a fake threat to their only means of defense; metal slugs moving at 1300’/second.

      All jokes aside I own several firearms. If you cling to guns as a special facet of your personality you are a weak and failed individual. You deserve the mental anguish over your perceived persecution.

      • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I can even understand guns being an issue that weighs on your mind when you vote. It has crossed my mind. The thing for me though is my gun case holds tools. I don’t need to choose tools over the lives, healthcare/support, or equality under the law of other people.

        That to me is bonkers.

    • the_toast_is_gone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Kamala Harris is on record saying she wants mandatory buybacks - that is, mandatory confiscations. So chances are, if she becomes president, we’ll see her pushing for it.