According to the debate, they had their reasons. But still – when one hundred and eighty six nations say one thing, and two say another, you have to wonder about the two.

  • htrayl@lemmy.world
    21·
    1 month ago

    I would say your simply wrong.

    It is not more moral to keep billions of animals alive, and in miserable conditions, solely for the purpose of consuming them, despite any romanticized idea of keeping a completely artificially selected species around.

    And also, that there isn’t a world where we completely give up meat eating anyways, and even less of a world where we let them go extinct.