According to the debate, they had their reasons. But still – when one hundred and eighty six nations say one thing, and two say another, you have to wonder about the two.

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.worldEnglish
    191·
    1 month ago

    Except if US really supported the right to food, domestically, then wellfare benefits and minimum wage would be higher, Price controls would be in place for staple foods, and there would be more regulation on food safety.

    US just doesnt like being told what to do, and will adamantly do the exact opposite of any good if anyone but Muricuh suggests it.

    because whats a bunch of malnourished babies and driving people to crime for basic necessities, compared to FrEeDuMb

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      10·
      1 month ago

      Yeah, unfortunately this seems to be the take with many resolutions. The U.S. doesn’t even want the possibility of being compelled to do something.