• Hannes@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    29 days ago

    That’s the thing - if science is projecting something for the future nothing is 100% certain - so they have to widen the range in order to have a statement with a lower number that’s “90% certain” even if there’s a very high chance that it’s going to be way worse

    • NoiseColor
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      29 days ago

      Absolutely, but if you ask climate scientists, in private, what they think the numbers are saying, they will tell you a very different story.

      • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        29 days ago

        I would guess we’ve been fucked for at least a couple of decades by now. In their need to “reach a consensus” we have been sold an unrealistic narrative of hope lol

        • NoiseColor
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          28 days ago

          Yes, well phrased. All though I think there was hope. There is always hope, but none of the deciders care or have cared.