The use of depleted uranium munitions has been fiercely debated, with opponents like the International Coalition to Ban Uranium Weapons saying there are dangerous health risks from ingesting or inhaling depleted uranium dust, including cancers and birth defects.

    • mashbooq@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago
      1. correlation ≠ causation. 2) if the disease is caused by DU, is it due to the radioactivity or the fact that DU is a heavy metal?
      • i never said it had to be because of radiation. Even just in its effect as a heavy metal it seems to be much worse. Also it could be that it becomes airborn more easily than other metals such as lead, so the wreckage of tanks shot with DU are more dangerous to the people cleaning them up.

        • mashbooq@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Why are you so worried about speculated harms when Ukrainians are actually being raped, tortured, and murdered by russians? Your lack of humanity is showing

            • mashbooq@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Weighing costs and benefits happens with a comprehensive set of actual facts, not a hodgepodge of speculations and fearmongering that play into the fascists’ hands

    • letsgocrazy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      How do you you it’s not linked to any of the other hundreds of dangerous chemicals?

      • Because the issue is specific to the region and started specifically after the tank battle where DU ammunition was used. If it would be a general issue with some dangerous chemical being used, we’d expect to see similiar issues in other regions. Of course it is hypotheticakky possible that at the same time some dangerous and persistant chemical exposure happened in the region, but that is not plausible and also the US would have a strong interest in finding such an alternative explanation. But there isn’t any research published, that provided an alternative.

        Also look into the wording of the US when sending the ammunition to Ukraine. They state that no radiation hazard is to be expected for the Ukrainians. They do not talk about a toxicological hazard.