• mim@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Nothing says desperation like going to a country even more sanctioned to buy some weapons.

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    As viewers of Perun Will know, North Korea has one of the largest stockpiles of artillery shells in the world. Russia uses artillery at a prodigious rate, and can’t keep up with its usage.

    So Russia gets the older stockpile of artillery shells, which we knew they’re going to get, the worrisome thing is what is North Korea going to get from the deal?

    • hydrospanner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      If they were smart, food and fuel.

      Since they’re NK, probably personal enrichment for Kim, and maybe some cold war era nukes.

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Money sure. Probably access to energy reserves, maybe even a pipeline for natural gas to North Korea. But more likely military technology

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Which currency?

        Rubles are pretty useless at the moment, and for the foreseeable future.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      North Korea has one of the largest stockpiles of artillery shells in the world.

      I’m curious how well preserved those shells are. Russia itself was sending shells to the front that were non-functional because of poor storage. I wonder if North Korea did a better job of preservation.

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s going to be a low percentage, but that’s better than nothing, maybe it isn’t better than nothing I don’t know. The artillery crews aren’t going to be super happy about old ammunition I’m sure.

        • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          There has also been a history of North Korea screwing over Russia with regards to arms. Recently North Korea hacked Russia to steal hypersonic missile designs and data. Even if the overall percentage of ruined shells is lower, North Korea could choose to send ALL of the ruined ones to Russia with a number good shells, and charge Russia as though all of them are good.

  • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    The best thing about buying weapons from north Korea is all the artillery pieces come with oxen for maximum battlefield mobility.

  • Finnish_nationalisti@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    46
    ·
    1 year ago

    North Korea’s biggest sin is surviving a genocidial war against them by the US, the West simply cannot forgive such transgressions.

    • kiwifoxtrot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I believe that you have it backwards. North Korea, backed by China and with the approval and arming by the USSR, invaded South Korea. South Korea remains independent today because it was defended by the UN. The North’s allies promised to rebuild the North after the war and poured billions of roubles into the country. They remained dependent on the eastern bloc countries until the USSR fell and China opened up to the West. The North’s economy fell apart in the 1990’s after they were no longer propped up by others. The US provided $600 million in aid for food and energy starting in 1995. Sanctions against North Korea did not start until 2006.

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Fun fact, Russia a permanent member of the UN security council could a vetoed the UN resolution allowing UN intervention in The Korean civil war. But they were boycotting the UN at the time for some reason

      • Finnish_nationalisti@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        North Korea invaded South Korea as much as revolutionary Americans “invaded” loyalist Americans.

        North Korea indeed did have some troubles in the 1990s, which is to be expected when one is cut off from all support, yet they pulled through well and are now self-sufficient. One can’t say the same about South Korea with its worsening living conditions and plummeting birth rates, and this is with Western support.

        • bobman@unilem.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          From Wikipedia:

          After failed attempts of negotiations on unification, North Korean army (Korean People’s Army or KPA) forces crossed the border and drove into South Korea on 25 June 1950.

          Sounds way more like Russia invading Ukraine.

          • Finnish_nationalisti@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Was the American revolution an “invasion” against the english? Or the French revolution an “invasion” against the monarchists?

      • bobman@unilem.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        🥱

        Imagine having a discussion with some that disagrees with you.

        Look at Cuba, to see how much the US doesn’t play fair with communist nations.