Surprised pikachu face

        • utopiah@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 months ago

          I like Ollama, and recommend it to tinker, but I admit this “LLM Explorer” is quite neat thanks to sections like “LLMs Fit 16GB VRAM”

          Ollama just works but it doesn’t help to pick which model best fits your needs.

          • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            pick which model best fits your needs.

            What is the need I have to put the effort in to install all this locally. Websites win in terms of convenience.

            • morriscox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              I want to work on my stuff in peace and in private without worrying about a company grabbing my stuff and using it for themselves and to give/sell it to other outfits, including the government. “If you have nothing to hide…” is bullshit and needs to die.

            • utopiah@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              I don’t think I understand your point, are you saying there is no benefit in running locally and that Websites or APIs are more convenient?

              • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                I already have stable diffusion on a local machine. I was trying to find motivation to install a LLM locally. You answered my question in a different response

                use cases where customization helps while quality does matter much due to scale, i.e spam, then LLMs and related tools are amazing.

    • T156@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      At the same time, the trouble with local LLMs is that they’re very resource heavy. Your average household computer isn’t going to be able to run one with much usability or speed.

      • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Which, you know, is fine. Maybe if people had an idea of how much power is required to run them, they would think twice before using a gigawatt to output a poem about farts, and perhaps even wonder how OpenAI can offer that for free. Btw, a 7b model should run ok on any PC with at least 16GB of RAM and a modern processor/GPU.

      • TriflingToad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        it’s a lot slower that chatgpt but on my integrated graphics i7 laptop it ran decent, def enough to be useable. Also there’s different models to play around with, some are faster but worse and some are smarter but slower

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Okay but what problem does that solve? Is the solution setting up our own spambots to fill forums with arguments counter to their bullshit spambots? I don’t see how an LLM improves literally anything ever in any circumstance.

      • trainsaresexy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        You seem unnecessarily hostile about this. If you don’t like LLM just move on.

        This is exactly why this sub about technology is better off without business news. You’re just reacting to something you hate and directing that at others.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          But answer the question maybe

          Also, my “hate” was very clearly directed towards LLMs and not a “person”.

      • utopiah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        FWIW I did try a lot (LLMs, code, generative AI for images, 3D models) in a lot of ways (CLI, Web based, chat bot) both locally and using APIs.

        I don’t use any on a daily basis. I find it exciting that we can theoretically do a lot “more” automatically but… so far the results have not been worth the efforts. Sadly some of the best use cases are exactly what you highlighted, i.e low effort engagement for spam. Overall I find that either working with a professional (script writer, 3D modeler, dev, designer, etc) is a lot more rewarding but also more efficient which itself makes it cheaper.

        For use cases where customization helps while quality does matter much due to scale, i.e spam, then LLMs and related tools are amazing.

        PS: I’d love to hear the opinion of a spammer actually, maybe they also think it’s not that efficient either.

        • T156@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          I have personally found generative-text LLMs quite good for creating titles. As an example, I have a few hundred tweets that I’m trying to put into a file, and I’ll use an LLM to create a human-readable name for them. It’s much better than a lot of the other summarisation mechanisms (like BERT) I’ve tried with it, but it’s still not perfect, because the model tends to output the same thing in slightly different words each time, so repeat runs will often result in the same thing with a different title.

          But, that is also a fairly limited use case.