• lawful good – grassy trams
  • neutral good – bicycles
  • chaotic good – rail bicycles
  • lawful neutral – diesel trains
  • true neutral – walking
  • chaotic neutral – parkour
  • lawful evil – airplanes
  • neutral evil – Las Vegas Loop
  • chaotic evil – rolling coal
  • zoe @infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    the problem isn’t the car, but the salary, which is basically straight theft, and that is eating on the Mh (man-hour). if one were paid twice as much, that would translate to 8 mile per Mh, also imagine there were one seat cars, instead of paying for a 5 seat car, u would save at least on half as much of the car cost ( also a 1L for 100km engine locked at 90km/h for speed is also logical), which translates to 16 miles per Mh, so on and so forth…also taxing the rich and subsidizing public facilities will extend Mhours way more…

    • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re right. For cars to make sense in financial terms, all we need is a mulligan on the last several decades of economic policy.

      • zoe @infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        if u want to transport friends and whatnot, then dont come complaining about car cost…i was just trying to optimize car use cases. sure u wanna go camping ? might as well buy a AWD car for a trip per year and pay for the fuel of daily work commute. might as well buy two cars in this regard…if only public transport was that reliable, and also wages were fair…

        • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The difference in fuel use between a two wheel drive and AWD vehicle is negligible, you might as well have an AWD. Especially if you don’t commute in your own car.

          • zoe @infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            u would think a 1L gasoline engine with 86Nm of torque would serve awd in rugged terrain ? unless u live in the us, where even front wheel’s are run by 2 liter diesel, at 360Nm